Literature DB >> 9607349

Artificial neural network model of survival in patients treated with irradiation with and without concurrent chemotherapy for advanced carcinoma of the head and neck.

T J Bryce1, M W Dewhirst, C E Floyd, V Hars, D M Brizel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of predicting survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with an artificial neural network (ANN), and to compare ANN performance with conventional models. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data were analyzed from a Phase III trial in which patients with locally advanced SCCHN received hyperfractionated irradiation with or without concurrent cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Of the 116 randomized patients, 95 who had 2-year follow-up and all required data were evaluated. ANN and logistic regression (LR) models were constructed to predict 2-year total survival using round-robin cross-validation. A modified staging model was also examined.
RESULTS: The best LR model used tumor size, nodal stage, and race to predict survival. The best ANN used nodal stage, tumor size, stage, and resectability, and hemoglobin. Treatment type did not predict 2-year survival and was not included in either model. Using the respective best feature sets, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) for the ANN was 0.78 +/- 0.05, showing more accurate overall performance than LR (Az = 0.67 +/- 0.05, p = 0.07). At 70% sensitivity, the ANN was 72% specific, while LR was 54% specific (p = 0.08). At 70% specificity, the ANN was 72% sensitive, while LR was 54% sensitive (p = 0.07). When both models used the five predictive variables best for an ANN, Az for LR decreased [Az = 0.61 +/- 0.06, p < 0.01 (ANN)]. The models performed equivalently when using the three variables best for LR. The best ANN also compared favorably with staging [Az = 0.60 +/- 0.07, p = 0.02 (ANN)].
CONCLUSIONS: An ANN modeled 2-year survival in this data set more accurately than LR or staging models and employed predictive variables that could not be used by LR. Further work is planned to confirm these results on larger patient samples, examining longer follow-up to incorporate treatment type into the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9607349     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00016-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  8 in total

Review 1.  Artificial neural networks for predictive modeling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Eduard J Gamito; E David Crawford
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  An artificial neural network improves prediction of observed survival in patients with laryngeal squamous carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew S Jones; Azzam G F Taktak; Timothy R Helliwell; John E Fenton; Martin A Birchall; David J Husband; Anthony C Fisher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Prediction of outcome in cancer patients with febrile neutropenia: a prospective validation of the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer risk index in a Chinese population and comparison with the Talcott model and artificial neural network.

Authors:  Edwin Pun Hui; Linda K S Leung; Terence C W Poon; Frankie Mo; Vicky T C Chan; Ada T W Ma; Annette Poon; Eugenie K Hui; So-Shan Mak; Maria Lai; Kenny I K Lei; Brigette B Y Ma; Tony S K Mok; Winnie Yeo; Benny C Y Zee; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  A review of deep learning based methods for medical image multi-organ segmentation.

Authors:  Yabo Fu; Yang Lei; Tonghe Wang; Walter J Curran; Tian Liu; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.685

Review 5.  Deep Learning: A Review for the Radiation Oncologist.

Authors:  Luca Boldrini; Jean-Emmanuel Bibault; Carlotta Masciocchi; Yanting Shen; Martin-Immanuel Bittner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Radiomics AI prediction for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) prognosis and recurrence with target volume approach.

Authors:  Tang Fh; Chu Cyw; Cheung Eyw
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-07-05

7.  Machine Learning for Head and Neck Cancer: A Safe Bet?-A Clinically Oriented Systematic Review for the Radiation Oncologist.

Authors:  Stefania Volpe; Matteo Pepa; Mattia Zaffaroni; Federica Bellerba; Riccardo Santamaria; Giulia Marvaso; Lars Johannes Isaksson; Sara Gandini; Anna Starzyńska; Maria Cristina Leonardi; Roberto Orecchia; Daniela Alterio; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.