Literature DB >> 9604355

The pitch of a mistuned harmonic: evidence for a template model.

J Y Lin1, W M Hartmann.   

Abstract

A harmonic of a periodic complex tone can be heard out as a separate entity if the harmonic is slightly mistuned from its correct frequency. Pitch matching experiments show that the pitch of such a mistuned harmonic differs systematically from its frequency. The shift in pitch is found to be an exaggeration of the frequency mistuning. This article considers two classes of model for the pitch shift. In the first class are tonotopically local interaction models which attribute the pitch shift to interactions between the mistuned harmonic and neighboring harmonics, where the neighborhood is established by peripheral filtering. The second class of model attributes the pitch shift to a contrast between the mistuned harmonic and a broadband harmonic template. This article describes six pitch matching experiments using complex tones having spectral gaps, strategically chosen to compare local interaction and template models. The results show that when a competition is set up between local interactions and a template, the template proves to be dominant. A parallel between the pitch shifts of mistuned harmonics and periodicity pitch, also attributed to a harmonic template, is seen as the frequency range of the mistuned harmonic is changed. Tonotopically local influences are evident in several experiments, but they are of secondary importance.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9604355     DOI: 10.1121/1.422781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Inharmonicity detection. Effects of age and contralateral distractor sounds.

Authors:  Manon Grube; D Yves von Cramon; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to double harmonic tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex; Hongzhe Li
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Spectral processing and sound source determination.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Int Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.230

4.  Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones.

Authors:  Donal G Sinex
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Brainstem correlates of speech-in-noise perception in children.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Steven Zecker; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Perception and cortical neural coding of harmonic fusion in ferrets.

Authors:  Sridhar Kalluri; Didier A Depireux; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory discrimination of frequency ratios: the octave singularity.

Authors:  Damien Bonnard; Christophe Micheyl; Catherine Semal; René Dauman; Laurent Demany
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The oscillatory entrainment of virtual pitch perception.

Authors:  Aleksandar Aksentijevic; Anthony Northeast; Daniel Canty; Mark A Elliott
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.