Literature DB >> 9603091

Importance of a reliable admission Glasgow Coma Scale score for determining the need for evacuation of posttraumatic subdural hematomas: a prospective study of 65 patients.

F Servadei1, M T Nasi, A M Cremonini, G Giuliani, P Cenni, A Nanni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients who have an acute subdural hematoma with a thickness of 10 mm or less and with a shift of the midline structures of 5 mm or less often can be treated nonoperatively. We wonder whether the knowledge of the clinical status both in the prehospital determination and on admission to the neurosurgical center can predict the need for evacuation of subdural hematomas as well as the computed tomographic (CT) parameters.
METHODS: From January 1, 1994, to May 31, 1996, 65 comatose patients harboring an acute subdural hematoma of 5 mm or more and not brain dead were admitted to our intensive care unit. Of the 65 patients, 15 patients were initially managed conservatively according to a protocol based on clinical, CT, and intracranial pressure parameters. During the study period, the use of long-lasting paralytic agents has been eliminated to allow detection of clinical deterioration in the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score from the prehospital determination to the hospital admission assessment.
RESULTS: Of the 15 patients initially managed conservatively, two were subsequently operated on because of evolving parenchymal hematomas. When comparing demographic, clinical, and CT parameters between the surgical group of patients and the patients initially conservatively treated, hematoma thickness (mean, 17.1 mm vs. 7.5 mm, p < 0.0001) and shift of the midline structures (mean, 12.8 mm vs. 4.7 mm, p < 0.008) were predictive of the need for surgery. A statistically significant change in the GCS score between prehospital determination and admission assessment was shown in the surgical group of patients (mean GCS score, 8.4 vs. 6.7, p < 0.01), and it was not present (mean GCS score, 7.3 vs. 7.2) in the patients initially conservatively treated. Functional outcomes were present in 23 cases (35.4%); functional outcomes in the initially conservatively treated patients were reached by 10 patients (66.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Nonoperative management for selected cases of acute subdural hematomas is at least as safe as surgical management. GCS scoring at the scene and in the emergency room combined with early and subsequent CT scanning is crucial when making the decision for nonoperative management. This strategy requires that administration of long-lasting sedatives and paralytic medications be avoided before the patient arrives at the neurosurgical center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9603091     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199805000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  18 in total

1.  Risk Factors of Chronic Subdural Hematoma Progression after Conservative Management of Cases with Initially Acute Subdural Hematoma.

Authors:  Jong Joo Lee; Yusam Won; Taeyoung Yang; Sion Kim; Chun-Sik Choi; Jaeyoung Yang
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-10-31

2.  Identification of a neurologic scale that optimizes EMS detection of older adult traumatic brain injury patients who require transport to a trauma center.

Authors:  Erin B Wasserman; Manish N Shah; Courtney M C Jones; Jeremy T Cushman; Jeffrey M Caterino; Jeffrey J Bazarian; Suzanne M Gillespie; Julius D Cheng; Ann Dozier
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  The Neurocritical and Neurosurgical Care of Subdural Hematomas.

Authors:  Kevin T Huang; Wenya Linda Bi; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Sandra C Yan; Ian J Tafel; Ian F Dunn; William B Gormley
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Adverse Outcomes After Initial Non-surgical Management of Subdural Hematoma: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Nicholas A Morris; Alexander E Merkler; Whitney E Parker; Jan Claassen; E Sander Connolly; Kevin N Sheth; Hooman Kamel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.210

5.  Treatment of acute subdural hematoma.

Authors:  Carter Gerard; Katharina M Busl
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.598

6.  Whole-brain apparent diffusion coefficient in traumatic brain injury: correlation with Glasgow Coma Scale score.

Authors:  Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Rao P Gullapalli; Stuart E Mirvis; Steven Roys; Prasad Murthy
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Acute traumatic subdural hematoma: current mortality and functional outcomes in adult patients at a Level I trauma center.

Authors:  Christina G Ryan; Rachel E Thompson; Nancy R Temkin; Paul K Crane; Richard G Ellenbogen; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 8.  Management of Subdural Hematomas: Part II. Surgical Management of Subdural Hematomas.

Authors:  Elena I Fomchenko; Emily J Gilmore; Charles C Matouk; Jason L Gerrard; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 9.  Management of Subdural Hematomas: Part I. Medical Management of Subdural Hematomas.

Authors:  Elena I Fomchenko; Emily J Gilmore; Charles C Matouk; Jason L Gerrard; Kevin N Sheth
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  Knowledge of Glasgow coma scale by air-rescue physicians.

Authors:  Catherine Heim; Patrick Schoettker; Nicolas Gilliard; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.