Literature DB >> 9603001

An anthropological exploration of contemporary bioethics: the varieties of common sense.

L Turner1.   

Abstract

Patients and physicians can inhabit distinctive social worlds where they are guided by diverse understandings of moral practice. Despite the contemporary presence of multiple moral traditions, religious communities and ethnic backgrounds, two of the major methodological approaches in bioethics, casuistry and principlism, rely upon the notion of a common morality. However, the heterogeneity of ethnic, moral, and religious traditions raises questions concerning the singularity of common sense. Indeed, it might be more appropriate to consider plural traditions of moral reasoning. This poses a considerable challenge for bioethicists because the existence of plural moral traditions can lead to difficulties regarding "closure" in moral reasoning. The topics of truth-telling, informed consent, euthanasia, and brain death and organ transplantation reveal the presence of different understandings of common sense. With regard to these subjects, plural accounts of "common sense" moral reasoning exist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9603001      PMCID: PMC1377459          DOI: 10.1136/jme.24.2.127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  11 in total

Review 1.  Religious ethics and active euthanasia in a pluralistic society.

Authors:  C S Campbell
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1992-09

2.  Moral reasoning in social context.

Authors:  T H Murray
Journal:  J Soc Issues       Date:  1993

3.  Truth telling to the patient.

Authors:  A Surbone
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Unlimited human autonomy - a cultural bias?

Authors:  S M Glick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The priesthood of bioethics and the return of casuistry.

Authors:  K W Wildes
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1993-02

6.  Changes in physicians' attitudes toward telling the cancer patient.

Authors:  D H Novack; R Plumer; R L Smith; H Ochitill; G R Morrow; J M Bennett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1979-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cultural aspects of nondisclosure.

Authors:  C J Orona; B A Koenig; A J Davis
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Medical ethics in cross-cultural and multi-cultural perspectives.

Authors:  P Kunstadter
Journal:  Soc Sci Med Med Anthropol       Date:  1980-11

9.  Understanding cultural difference in caring for dying patients.

Authors:  B A Koenig; J Gates-Williams
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-09

10.  Western bioethics on the Navajo reservation. Benefit or harm?

Authors:  J A Carrese; L A Rhodes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-09-13       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The ground of dialogical bioethics.

Authors:  Abraham Rudnick
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2002

2.  Bioethics policies and the compass of common morality.

Authors:  Ronald A Lindsay
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2009

3.  On autonomy and identity.

Authors:  J Calinas-Correia
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The burden of surgical diseases on critical care services at a tertiary hospital in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Jared Tomlinson; Bryce Haac; Clement Kadyaudzu; Jonathan C Samuel; Emilia L P Campbell; Clara N Lee; Anthony G Charles
Journal:  Trop Doct       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 0.731

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.