Literature DB >> 9601956

MRI of the breast: state of the art.

M Friedrich1.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast is probably the most sensitive method to detect breast pathology. It is best used to improve the sensitivity of mammography and sonography in selected patient groups with high breast cancer prevalence, where conventional methods are known to be less sensitive. Despite the high sensitivity of MRI, 5-12 % of invasive carcinomas are not recognized during MRI, because of lack of the typical criteria of carcinoma. MRI is probably inferior to mammography in detecting ductal in-situ carcinoma or very small carcinomas (< 3 mm), because the neo-angiogenesis induced by these small carcinomas is too faint to be detected by contrast-enhanced MRI. These tumours cannot be excluded by a normal MRI examination. MRI is non-specific as the distinction of benign and malignant breast lesions is unreliable. Only in selected cases (fat- or blood-containing lesions) may it improve the specificity of mammography and sonography. Mostly image-guided core biopsy is by far the most specific and least expensive method to establish a definitive diagnosis. For lesions exclusively detected by contrast-enhanced MRI, simple and reliable localisation devices are urgently needed. Presently accepted indications for MRI of the breast are: patients with silicone implants after mastectomy or augmentation mammoplasty (detection of recurrence/prosthesis rupture/silicon leakage); patients whose breasts are difficult to evaluate by combined mammography and sonography, who have had breast conservation therapy (local recurrence), or who have proven carcinoma in one breast (multifocality/-centricity or contralateral breast carcinoma) or proven axillary lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor, especially when these are hormone receptor positive; patients with extensive postoperative scarring. In the future, genetically defined high breast cancer risk may become an indication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9601956     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  8 in total

Review 1.  PET/CT and breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Zangheri; Cristina Messa; Maria Picchio; Luigi Gianolli; Claudio Landoni; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Sven C A Michel; Mathias K Fehr; Achim H Kaim; Hans C Steinert; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Development and validation of an algorithm for registration of serial 3D MR breast data sets.

Authors:  Jürgen R Reichenbach; Jens Hopfe; Matthias E Bellemann; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.533

4.  Identification of women with early breast cancer by analysis of p43-positive lymphocytes.

Authors:  L Auerbach; M Hellan; M Stierer; A C Rosen; C Ausch; R Obwegeser; E Kubista; G Wolf; H R Rosen; S Panzer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Evaluation of total choline from in-vivo volume localized proton MR spectroscopy and its response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  N R Jagannathan; M Kumar; V Seenu; O Coshic; S N Dwivedi; P K Julka; A Srivastava; G K Rath
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component.

Authors:  Arjan P Schouten van der Velden; Carla Boetes; Peter Bult; Theo Wobbes
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Impact of screening for breast cancer in high-risk women on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  A J Rijnsburger; M L Essink-Bot; S van Dooren; G J J M Borsboom; C Seynaeve; C C M Bartels; J G M Klijn; A Tibben; H J de Koning
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography.

Authors:  Eun-Ha Moon; Seok Tae Lim; Yeon-Hee Han; Young Jin Jeong; Yun-Hee Kang; Hwan-Jeong Jeong; Myung-Hee Sohn
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.991

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.