Literature DB >> 9599708

Biomarker strategies to evaluate the environmental effects of chemicals.

C H Walker1.   

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment of chemicals depends on the production of toxicity data for surrogate species of mammals, birds, and fish and on making comparisons between these and estimated or predicted environmental concentrations of the chemicals. This paper gives an overview of biomarker assays and strategies that might be used as alternatives, that is, to replace, reduce, or refine currently used ecotoxicity tests that cause suffering to vertebrates. In the present context a biomarker is a biologic response to an environmental chemical at the individual level or below which demonstrates a departure from normal status. Of immediate interest and relevance are nondestructive assays that provide a measure of toxic effect in vertebrate species and that can be used in both laboratory and parallel field studies. A major shortcoming of this approach is that such assays are currently only available for a limited number of chemicals, primarily when the mode of action is known. Nondestructive assays can be performed on blood, skin, excreta, and eggs of birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians. An interesting recent development is the use of vertebrate cell cultures, including transgenic cell lines that have been developed specifically for toxicity testing. The ultimate concern in ecotoxicology is the effects of chemicals at the level of populations and above. Current risk assessment practices do not address this problem. The development of biomarker strategies could be part of a movement toward more ecologic end points in the safety evaluation of chemicals, which would effect a reduction in animal tests that cause suffering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9599708      PMCID: PMC1533409          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.98106613

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  7 in total

Review 1.  Role of physiological energetics in ecotoxicology.

Authors:  J Widdows; P Donkin
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Cytochrome P-450 and oxidative metabolism in invertebrates.

Authors:  D R Livingstone
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.407

3.  Immunosuppressive activities of polychlorinated biphenyls in C57BL/6N mice: structure-activity relationships as Ah receptor agonists and partial antagonists.

Authors:  D Davis; S Safe
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  S H Safe
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Species-specific recombinant cell lines as bioassay systems for the detection of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-like chemicals.

Authors:  P M Garrison; K Tullis; J M Aarts; A Brouwer; J P Giesy; M S Denison
Journal:  Fundam Appl Toxicol       Date:  1996-04

6.  The lizard Gallotia galloti as a bioindicator of organophosphorus contamination in the Canary Islands.

Authors:  M C Fossi; J C Sànchez-Hernàndez; R Dìaz-Dìaz; L Lari; J E Garcia-Hernàndez; C Gaggi
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 8.071

Review 7.  Vitellogenesis as a biomarker for estrogenic contamination of the aquatic environment.

Authors:  J P Sumpter; S Jobling
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  7 in total

1.  Biomarker assessment of toxicity with miniaturised bioassays: diclofenac as a case study.

Authors:  Raquel Feito; Yolanda Valcárcel; Myriam Catalá
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Effect of β-naphthoflavone on hepatic cytochrome P4501A activity in the scribbled rabbitfish (Siganus spinus) from tropical Indo-Pacific coral reefs.

Authors:  Carmen Emborski; Andres Reyes; Jason S Biggs
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  DNA fingerprint comparison of rainbow trout and RTG-2 cell line using random amplified polymorphic DNA.

Authors:  C Becerril; H Acevedo; M Ferrero; F Sanz; A Castaño
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  13th Meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals (SGOMSEC): alternative testing methodologies for ecotoxicity.

Authors:  C Walker; K Kaiser; W Klein; L Lagadic; D Peakall; S Sheffield; T Soldan; M Yasuno
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Metal Bioaccumulation, Cytogenetic and Clinico-Biochemical Alterations in Rattus norvegicus Exposed In Situ to a Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Lagos, Nigeria.

Authors:  Adeyinka M Gbadebo; Okunola A Alabi; Chibuisi G Alimba; Adekunle A Bakare
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 6.  The midgut epithelium of aquatic arthropods: a critical target organ in environmental toxicology.

Authors:  Barry J Beaty; Ryan S Mackie; Kimberly S Mattingly; Jonathan O Carlson; Alfredo Rayms-Keller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Apoptosis, metallothionein, and bioavailable metals in domestic mice (Mus musculus L.) from a human-inhabited volcanic area.

Authors:  André Amaral; Carolina Cabral; Cláudia Guedes; Armindo Rodrigues
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 2.935

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.