Literature DB >> 9598608

Toward a perspective on orthodontic retention?

C Melrose1, D T Millett.   

Abstract

Retention is one of the most difficult challenges facing the clinician in orthodontics. In this article we collate current knowledge regarding the origin of orthodontic relapse and attempt to rationalize the necessary factors in planning orthodontic retention. Despite extensive research, the various elements leading to relapse of treated malocclusions are incompletely understood, giving rise to wide variation in retention protocols among clinicians. Informed consent-with emphasis on the features of the original malocclusion and the patient's growth pattern, the type of treatment performed, the need for adjunctive surgical procedures, the type of retainer, and the duration of retention-should be obtained during the planning of the retention phase. True perspective on orthodontic retention is lacking and there is a great need for further research to ensure that evidence-based clinical practice is adopted in retention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9598608     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70261-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  32 in total

1.  Performance of clear vacuum-formed thermoplastic retainers depending on retention protocol: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eleftherios G Kaklamanos; Maria Kourakou; Dimitrios Kloukos; Ioannis Doulis; Smaragda Kavvadia
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  A multicentre audit of GDPs knowledge of orthodontic retention.

Authors:  S Kotecha; S Gale; L Khamashta-Ledezma; J Scott; M Seedat; M Storey; A Ulhaq; J Scholey
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Survival of post-treatment canine-to-canine lingual retainers with fiber-reinforced composite resin: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Davide Farronato; Roberto Briguglio; Francesco Mangano; Lorenzo Azzi; Giovanni Battista Grossi; Francesco Briguglio
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2014-11-20

4.  Long-term effects of different cleaning methods on copolyester retainer properties.

Authors:  Emily Wible; Manika Agarwal; Sibel Altun; Tyler Ramir; Grace Viana; Carla Evans; Henry Lukic; Spiro Megremis; Phimon Atsawasuwan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Modified Wrap-Around Retainer: A Quick Tip To Enhance the Retention of the Appliance.

Authors:  Kanhu Charan Sahoo; Snigdha Pattanaik
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

6.  Post-treatment changes in permanent retention.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; U Schulte; K Küpper; C Bourauel; L Keilig; S N Papageorgiou; C Dirk; C Kirschneck; N Daratsianos; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Accuracy of fit of 3-to-3 retainers after adhesive fixation using a neodymium-iron-boron magnet chain.

Authors:  Wolfram Hahn; Wiebke Wasser-Merkel; Katharina Lange; Rudolf M Gruber; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Dankmar Ihlow
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Long-term effects of various cleaning methods on polypropylene/ethylene copolymer retainer material.

Authors:  Emily Wible; Manika Agarwal; Sibel Altun; Tyler Ramir; Grace Viana; Carla Evans; Henry Lukic; Spiro Megremis; Phimon Atsawasuwan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Comparison of Two Retention Appliances with Respect to Clinical Effectiveness.

Authors:  Yeşim Kaya; Murat Tunca; Sıddık Keskin
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01

10.  A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers.

Authors:  Stephen Barlin; Roland Smith; Ray Reed; Jonathan Sandy; Anthony John Ireland
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.