PURPOSE: Experience with continuous EEG monitoring in 29 consecutive infants at risk of neonatal seizures demonstrated that background abnormalities on the initial EEG were strongly associated with electrographic seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h. To test this association prospectively, we examined the relationship between EEG background and the presence of electrographic seizures in the next 22 at-risk infants monitored for seizures. METHODS: A standard EEG was recorded for each infant at risk for seizures. Based on specific criteria, the background was graded as normal; immature for age; or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal. The EEG was then monitored continuously until no electrographic seizures were recorded for 18-24 h. RESULTS: Findings in the retrospective group of 29 infants and the prospective group of 22 infants did not differ. For the combined 51 infants, a normal or immature initial EEG background predicted the absence of seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h with a sensitivity of 96% [confidence interval (CI) 0.88, 1.0] and specificity of 81% (CI 0.67, 0.96). Administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before the start of the EEG recording did not affect this association. CONCLUSIONS: In 51 consecutively monitored infants at risk for neonatal seizures, a normal or immature EEG background strongly predicted the absence of electrographic seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h; background abnormalities strongly predicted the occurrence of electrographic seizures concomitantly or in the subsequent 18-24 h of recording. Screening infants at risk for neonatal seizures with a routine EEG allows identification of infants at highest risk for seizures, thus conserving resources required for continuous EEG monitoring and facilitating early intervention for seizures.
PURPOSE: Experience with continuous EEG monitoring in 29 consecutive infants at risk of neonatal seizures demonstrated that background abnormalities on the initial EEG were strongly associated with electrographic seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h. To test this association prospectively, we examined the relationship between EEG background and the presence of electrographic seizures in the next 22 at-risk infants monitored for seizures. METHODS: A standard EEG was recorded for each infant at risk for seizures. Based on specific criteria, the background was graded as normal; immature for age; or mildly, moderately, or severely abnormal. The EEG was then monitored continuously until no electrographic seizures were recorded for 18-24 h. RESULTS: Findings in the retrospective group of 29 infants and the prospective group of 22 infants did not differ. For the combined 51 infants, a normal or immature initial EEG background predicted the absence of seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h with a sensitivity of 96% [confidence interval (CI) 0.88, 1.0] and specificity of 81% (CI 0.67, 0.96). Administration of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) before the start of the EEG recording did not affect this association. CONCLUSIONS: In 51 consecutively monitored infants at risk for neonatal seizures, a normal or immature EEG background strongly predicted the absence of electrographic seizures in the subsequent 18-24 h; background abnormalities strongly predicted the occurrence of electrographic seizures concomitantly or in the subsequent 18-24 h of recording. Screening infants at risk for neonatal seizures with a routine EEG allows identification of infants at highest risk for seizures, thus conserving resources required for continuous EEG monitoring and facilitating early intervention for seizures.
Authors: Jennifer M Kwon; Ronnie Guillet; Seetha Shankaran; Abbot R Laptook; Scott A McDonald; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Jon E Tyson; T Michael O'Shea; Ronald N Goldberg; Edward F Donovan; Avroy A Fanaroff; W Kenneth Poole; Rosemary D Higgins; Michele C Walsh Journal: J Child Neurol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 1.987
Authors: Nicholas S Abend; Ram Mani; Tammy N Tschuda; Tae Chang; Alexis A Topjian; Maureen Donnelly; Denise LaFalce; Margaret C Krauss; Sarah E Schmitt; Joshua M Levine Journal: Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol Date: 2011-09
Authors: Hannah C Glass; Courtney J Wusthoff; Renée A Shellhaas; Tammy N Tsuchida; Sonia Lomeli Bonifacio; Malaika Cordeiro; Joseph Sullivan; Nicholas S Abend; Taeun Chang Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Lila T Worden; Dhinakaran M Chinappen; Sally M Stoyell; Jacquelyn Gold; Luis Paixao; Kalpathy Krishnamoorthy; Mark A Kramer; Michael B Westover; Catherine J Chu Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Igor Fridman; Malaika Cordeiro; Khodayar Rais-Bahrami; Neil J McDonald; James J Reese; An N Massaro; Joan A Conry; Taeun Chang; Walid Soussou; Tammy N Tsuchida Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Hannah C Glass; David Glidden; Rita J Jeremy; A James Barkovich; Donna M Ferriero; Steven P Miller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 4.406