Arnold J Sansevere1, Kush Kapur2, Jurriaan M Peters1, Ivan Sánchez Fernández1, Tobias Loddenkemper1, Janet S Soul2. 1. Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 2. Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Conventional video-EEG monitoring is required to diagnose seizures accurately in neonates. This tool is resource-intense and has limited availability in many centers. Seizure prediction models could help allocate resources by improving efficiency in which conventional video-EEG monitoring is used to detect subclinical seizures. The aim of this retrospective study was to create a neonate-specific seizure prediction model using clinical characteristics and EEG background findings. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year retrospective study of all consecutive neonates who underwent conventional video-EEG monitoring at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Variables including age, EEG indication, high-risk clinical characteristics, and EEG background informed seizure prediction models based on a multivariable logistic regression model. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to construct time to first EEG seizure. RESULTS: Prediction models with clinical variables or background EEG features alone versus combined clinical and background EEG features were created from 210 neonates who met inclusion criteria. The combined clinical and EEG model had a higher area under the curve for combined sensitivity and specificity to 83.0% when compared to the clinical model (76.4%) or EEG model (66.2%). The same trend of higher sensitivity of the combined model was found for time to seizure outcome. CONCLUSIONS: While both clinical and EEG background features were predictive of neonatal seizures, the combination improved overall prediction of seizure occurrence and prediction of time to first seizure as compared with prediction models based solely on clinical or EEG features alone. With prospective validation, this model may improve efficiency of patient-oriented EEG monitoring.
PURPOSE: Conventional video-EEG monitoring is required to diagnose seizures accurately in neonates. This tool is resource-intense and has limited availability in many centers. Seizure prediction models could help allocate resources by improving efficiency in which conventional video-EEG monitoring is used to detect subclinical seizures. The aim of this retrospective study was to create a neonate-specific seizure prediction model using clinical characteristics and EEG background findings. METHODS: We conducted a 3-year retrospective study of all consecutive neonates who underwent conventional video-EEG monitoring at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Variables including age, EEG indication, high-risk clinical characteristics, and EEG background informed seizure prediction models based on a multivariable logistic regression model. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to construct time to first EEG seizure. RESULTS: Prediction models with clinical variables or background EEG features alone versus combined clinical and background EEG features were created from 210 neonates who met inclusion criteria. The combined clinical and EEG model had a higher area under the curve for combined sensitivity and specificity to 83.0% when compared to the clinical model (76.4%) or EEG model (66.2%). The same trend of higher sensitivity of the combined model was found for time to seizure outcome. CONCLUSIONS: While both clinical and EEG background features were predictive of neonatal seizures, the combination improved overall prediction of seizure occurrence and prediction of time to first seizure as compared with prediction models based solely on clinical or EEG features alone. With prospective validation, this model may improve efficiency of patient-oriented EEG monitoring.
Authors: Renée A Shellhaas; Taeun Chang; Tammy Tsuchida; Mark S Scher; James J Riviello; Nicholas S Abend; Sylvie Nguyen; Courtney J Wusthoff; Robert R Clancy Journal: J Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 2.177
Authors: Robert R Clancy; Uzma Sharif; Rebecca Ichord; Thomas L Spray; Susan Nicolson; Sarah Tabbutt; Gil Wernovsky; J William Gaynor Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Stacey K H Tay; Lawrence J Hirsch; Linda Leary; Nathalie Jette; John Wittman; Cigdem I Akman Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: N S Abend; A M Gutierrez-Colina; A A Topjian; H Zhao; R Guo; M Donnelly; R R Clancy; D J Dlugos Journal: Neurology Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: N S Abend; A Topjian; R Ichord; S T Herman; M Helfaer; M Donnelly; V Nadkarni; D J Dlugos; R R Clancy Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Hannah C Glass; David Glidden; Rita J Jeremy; A James Barkovich; Donna M Ferriero; Steven P Miller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2009-06-21 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Lila T Worden; Dhinakaran M Chinappen; Sally M Stoyell; Jacquelyn Gold; Luis Paixao; Kalpathy Krishnamoorthy; Mark A Kramer; Michael B Westover; Catherine J Chu Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 5.864