Literature DB >> 9595618

Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design.

T Tango1.   

Abstract

This paper considers a model for the difference of two proportions in a paired or matched design of clinical trials, case-control studies and also sensitivity comparison studies of two laboratory tests. This model includes a parameter indicating both interpatient variability of response probabilities and their correlation. Under the proposed model, we derive a one-sided test for equivalence based upon the efficient score. Equivalence is defined here as not more than 100 delta per cent inferior. McNemar's test for significance is shown to be a special case of the proposed test. Further, a score-based confidence interval for the difference of two proportions is derived. One of the features of these methods is applicability to the 2 x 2 table with off-diagonal zero cells; all the McNemar type tests and confidence intervals published so far cannot apply to such data. A Monte Carlo simulation study shows that the proposed test has empirical significance levels closer to the nominal alpha-level than the other tests recently proposed and further that the proposed confidence interval has better empirical coverage probability than those of the four published methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595618     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<891::aid-sim780>3.0.co;2-b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  25 in total

1.  Data analysis and data mining: current issues in biomedical informatics.

Authors:  R Bellazzi; M Diomidous; I N Sarkar; K Takabayashi; A Ziegler; A T McCray
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  [Multiparametric MRI and MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy in patients with prior negative prostate biopsy].

Authors:  C Kesch; J P Radtke; F Distler; S Boxler; T Klein; C Hüttenbrink; K Hees; W Roth; M Roethke; H P Schlemmer; M Hohenfellner; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Interim analyses in diagnostic versus treatment studies: differences and similarities.

Authors:  Oke Gerke; Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen; Mads Hvid Poulsen; Werner Vach
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-07-10

4.  Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial.

Authors:  Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  A note on monotonicity assumptions for exact unconditional tests in binary matched-pairs designs.

Authors:  Xiaochun Li; Mengling Liu; Judith D Goldberg
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  TNM staging with FDG-PET/CT in patients with primary head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Veit-Haibach; Christopher Luczak; Isabel Wanke; Markus Fischer; Thomas Egelhof; Thomas Beyer; Gerlinde Dahmen; Andreas Bockisch; Sandra Rosenbaum; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Further reduction of disqualification rates by additional MRI-targeted biopsy with transperineal saturation biopsy compared with standard 12-core systematic biopsies for the selection of prostate cancer patients for active surveillance.

Authors:  J P Radtke; T H Kuru; D Bonekamp; M T Freitag; M B Wolf; C D Alt; G Hatiboglu; S Boxler; S Pahernik; W Roth; M C Roethke; H P Schlemmer; M Hohenfellner; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  A Comparison of Testing Parameters and the Implementation of a Group Sequential Design for Equivalence Studies Using Paired-sample Analysis.

Authors:  Yunda Huang; Steven G Self
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 1.452

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT in primary staging of cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  Patrick Veit-Haibach; Florian M Vogt; Robert Jablonka; Hilmar Kuehl; Andreas Bockisch; Thomas Beyer; Gerlinde Dahmen; Sandra Rosenbaum; Gerald Antoch
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Efficient Noninferiority Testing Procedures for Simultaneously Assessing Sensitivity and Specificity of Two Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Guogen Shan; Amei Amei; Daniel Young
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 2.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.