Literature DB >> 21466507

A note on monotonicity assumptions for exact unconditional tests in binary matched-pairs designs.

Xiaochun Li1, Mengling Liu, Judith D Goldberg.   

Abstract

Exact unconditional tests have been widely applied to test the difference between two probabilities for 2 × 2 matched-pairs binary data with small sample size. In this context, Lloyd (2008, Biometrics 64, 716-723) proposed an E + M p-value, that showed better performance than the existing M p-value and C p-value. However, the analytical calculation of the E + M p-value requires that the Barnard convexity condition be satisfied; this can be challenging to prove theoretically. In this article, by a simple reformulation, we show that a weaker condition, conditional monotonicity, is sufficient to calculate all three p-values (M, C, and E + M) and their corresponding exact sizes. Moreover, this conditional monotonicity condition is applicable to noninferiority tests.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21466507      PMCID: PMC3132212          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01593.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Exact unconditional tests for a 2 x 2 matched-pairs design.

Authors:  R L Berger; K Sidik
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Exact unconditional tests for testing non-inferiority in matched-pairs design.

Authors:  Kurex Sidik
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A new exact and more powerful unconditional test of no treatment effect from binary matched pairs.

Authors:  Chris J Lloyd
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A more powerful exact test of noninferiority from binary matched-pairs data.

Authors:  Chris J Lloyd; Max V Moldovan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The 2 x 2 matched-pairs trial: exact unconditional design and analysis.

Authors:  S Suissa; J J Shuster
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Establishing equivalence of two treatments and sample size requirements in matched-pairs design.

Authors:  J M Nam
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Equivalence test and confidence interval for the difference in proportions for the paired-sample design.

Authors:  T Tango
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-04-30       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.