Literature DB >> 9595231

The value of neck drain in esophageal surgery: a randomized trial.

H K Choi1, S Law, K M Chu, J Wong.   

Abstract

The use of surgical drains in certain clean elective operations remains controversial. To evaluate the role of closed-suction drain for an esophageal anastomosis in the neck, we conducted a randomized, controlled study in 40 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy with an esophageal anastomosis in the neck, half of whom had a neck drain inserted at the end of operation. The median (range) duration of drainage was 46 hours (36 to 88 hours). The median (range) amount of drainage was 63 ml (15 to 210 ml). There was no incidence of haematoma or seroma formation in both the drained and non-drained groups. Anastomotic leakage did not occur in any patient. The benefits of closed suction neck drain could not be demonstrated. Routine use of neck drain for esophageal anastomosis in the neck is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9595231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Esophagus        ISSN: 1120-8694            Impact factor:   3.429


  7 in total

1.  Prevention of leaks in esophageal surgery.

Authors:  Fernando Mier; Brant K Oelschlager
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Factors predictive of increased surgical drain output after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Alem Yacob; Arya G Varthi; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Is Prophylactic Cervical Drainage Effective in Patients Undergoing McKeown Esophagectomy Reconstructed Through the Retrosternal Route with Two-Field Lymphadenectomy?

Authors:  Daisuke Fujiwara; Masayuki Watanabe; Yasukazu Kanie; Suguru Maruyama; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Jun Kanamori; Yu Imamura; Shinji Mine
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  The use of subfascial drains after multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: does the data support its use?

Authors:  Owoicho Adogwa; Syed I Khalid; Aladine A Elsamadicy; Victoria D Voung; Daniel T Lilly; Shyam A Desai; Amanda R Sergesketter; Joseph Cheng; Isaac O Karikari
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

6.  Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Taro Oshikiri; Gosuke Takiguchi; Susumu Miura; Nobuhisa Takase; Hiroshi Hasegawa; Masashi Yamamoto; Shingo Kanaji; Kimihiro Yamashita; Yoshiko Matsuda; Takeru Matsuda; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to promote recovery following esophageal cancer resection.

Authors:  Apurva Ashok; Devayani Niyogi; Priya Ranganathan; Sandeep Tandon; Maheema Bhaskar; George Karimundackal; Sabita Jiwnani; Madhavi Shetmahajan; C S Pramesh
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 2.549

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.