Literature DB >> 9594086

Evaluation of Glucocard Memory 2 and Accutrend sensor blood glucose meters.

S Arens1, V Moons, P Meuleman, F Struyf, Z Zaman.   

Abstract

The performance and practicability of 2 blood glucose meters (Glucocard Memory 2 and Accutrend sensor) were evaluated. Both glucose meters produced acceptably precise results in the hyper- and normoglycaemic concentration ranges. In the hypoglycaemic concentration range, the imprecision of Accutrend sensor was much higher than recommended by the American Diabetes Association. Within-run coefficients of variation for Glucocard Memory 2 were 6.3%, 3.9% and 2.4% at glucose concentrations of 1.7 mmol/l, 5.8 mmol/l and 11.7 mmol/l, respectively: for Accutrend sensor these were 15.2%, 5.0% and 1.2% at respective concentrations of 0.9 mmol/l, 4.2 mmol/l and 19.6 mmol/l. Between-day coefficients of variation for Glucocard Memory 2 were 4.8% and 3.5% at glucose concentrations of 3.9 mmol/l and 17.2 mmol/l, respectively and for Accutrend sensor they were 3.8% and 2.9% at glucose concentrations of 3.8 mmol/l and 18.7 mmol/l, respectively. Results were linear over a range of 1.6 mmol/l -29.7 mmol/l for Glucocard Memory 2 and 1.6 mmol/l -33.3 mmol/l for Accutrend sensor. Results of both blood glucose meters correlated closely with the hexokinase/glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase laboratory method. Ninety-eight percent of both Glucocard Memory 2 and Accutrend sensor results were within 20% of the comparison method values. Ninety-three percent of the Glucocard Memory 2 and 96% of the Accutrend sensor results were within 15% of the comparison method results. An inverse relation between the glucose readings and haematocrit values was observed for both blood glucose meters in the hyperglycaemic range and this effect was more pronounced for Accutrend sensor. In the normo- and hypoglycaemic ranges the effect was insignificant and absent, respectively. Minimum sample volume for Glucocard Memory 2 was 3 microliters and for Accutrend sensor it was 9 microliters. Lower sample volumes gave erroneous results. Presenting more than the required volume had no effect on results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9594086     DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  The Accutrend sensor glucose analyzer may not be adequate in bedside testing for neonatal hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Mark Rosenthal; Bernhard Ugele; Gerd Lipowsky; Helmut Küster
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Evaluation of Hematocrit Influence on Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose Based on ISO 15197:2013: Comparison of a Novel System With Five Systems With Different Hematocrit Ranges.

Authors:  Andrew Hattemer; Sami Wardat
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-29

3.  Diabetes and intermediate hyperglycaemia in Kisantu, DR Congo: a cross-sectional prevalence study.

Authors:  Muel Telo Muyer; Erik Muls; Mala Ali Mapatano; Jean-Robert Makulo; Moise Mvitu; Wivine Kimenyembo; Bien-Aimé Mandja; Pierre Kimbondo; Chris Bonketo Bieleli; Dieudonné Kaimbo Wa Kaimbo; Frank Buntinx
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Assessment of analytical performance of glucose meter in pediatric age group at tertiary care referral hospital.

Authors:  Mohit Vijay Rojekar; Vandana Kumawat; Jayesh Panot; Surekha Khedkar; Arati Adhe-Rojekar
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2017-09-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.