Literature DB >> 959403

Observations on the myth of "informed consent".

D Leeb, D G Bowers, J B Lynch.   

Abstract

A series of 100 patients in a general plastic surgery population were interviewed by standard format to determine their retention rate of preoperative information given to them. An overall recall, or retention rate, of 35 percent was found.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  1976        PMID： 959403     DOI： 10.1097/00006534-197609000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN： 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Patient autonomy, paternalism, and the conscientious physician.

Authors:  Stephen Wear
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1983-10

Review 2.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Why effective consent presupposes autonomous authorisation: a counterorthodox argument.

Authors:  M Epstein
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Rhinoplasty and its psychological implications: Applied psychology observations in aesthetic surgery.

Authors:  V Micheli-Pellegrini; G M Manfrida
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  The impact of iMedConsent on patient decision-making regarding cholecystectomy and inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Barbara H Hanusa; Galen E Switzer; Michael J Fine; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  How informed is our consent? Patient awareness of radiation and radical prostatectomy complications.

Authors:  Derek J Lomas; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-12-20

7.  [On informed patient consent].

Authors:  M C Kayser; Y von Harder; B Friemert; M A Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.955

8.  The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients' recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  C Mauffrey; E M Prempeh; J John; G Vasario
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Informed consent for inguinal herniorrhaphy and cholecystectomy: describing how patients make decisions to have surgery.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Penelope Morrison; Cara Nikolajski; Michael Fine; Robert Arnold; Susan L Zickmund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.565
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.