Literature DB >> 30817294

How informed is our consent? Patient awareness of radiation and radical prostatectomy complications.

Derek J Lomas1, Matthew J Ziegelmann1, Daniel S Elliott1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient's recall of pretreatment counseling for radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients presenting to our reconstructive urology clinic for the management of the complications of prostate cancer treatment was conducted over 24 months. Patients treated with only surgery or radiotherapy were included in the study. Patients were asked a standard series of questions to assess their recall of their pre-prostate cancer treatment counseling.
RESULTS: We identified 206 patients that met inclusion criteria. Of those, 153 underwent radical prostatectomy and 53 patients received radiation therapy. Median age at presentation was 72 years in the surgery group and 75 in the radiation therapy group. Mean time since treatment was 8.8 years in those that recalled being counseled and 9.9 years in those who did not (p=0.21). In the surgery group, the adverse effects experienced by 119 (77.8%) patients recalled, and counselled were related to the risk of treatment. In the surgical patients that had records with documentation of pretreatment counseling, 41/48 (85.4%) endorsed recall. In the surgery group, 117 (76.5%) stated that their treating physician was aware of their complication. In the radiation group, 5 patients (9.4%) endorsed recall (p<0.0001). In the subgroup of radiation patients with documentation of pre-treatment counseling, no patients endorsed recall. In the surgery group, 117 (76.5%) patients stated that their treating physicians were aware of their complication, while in the radiation group, only 16 (30.2%) of treating physicians were aware of the complications (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Patient recall of potential complications of prostate cancer treatment is poor. It's unclear if this is secondary to poor recall, selective memory loss or inadequate counseling.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30817294      PMCID: PMC6469723          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2018.81522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  18 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 2018.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively.

Authors:  G Robinson; A Merav
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Observations on the myth of "informed consent".

Authors:  D Leeb; D G Bowers; J B Lynch
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.730

4.  Improving informed consent for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy using multimedia techniques: a prospective randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Dennis Gyomber; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Peter Wong; Frank Parker; Damien M Bolton
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Comprehensibility of patient consent forms for radiation therapy of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Deborah Skinner MacDougall; Ulla M Connor; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Truth-telling and patient diagnoses.

Authors:  R J Sullivan; L W Menapace; R M White
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Evaluation of patient's understanding and recall of the consent process after open inguinal hernia repairs.

Authors:  Mohammed M Uzzaman; Sidhartha Sinha; Behnam Shaygi; Parveen Vitish-Sharma; Sofronis Loizides; Fiona Myint
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 6.071

8.  Informed consent: an evaluation of patients' understanding and opinion (with respect to the operation of transurethral resection of prostate).

Authors:  K C Saw; A M Wood; K Murphy; J R Parry; W G Hartfall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Information given to patients about adverse effects of radiotherapy: a survey of patients' views.

Authors:  G C Barnett; S C Charman; B Sizer; P A Murray
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.126

10.  Patients' assessment and recall of surgical information after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Kriwanek; C Armbruster; P Beckerhinn; W Blauensteier; M Gschwantler
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.588

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes after primary implantation and first revision surgery.

Authors:  Kevin J Hebert; Brian J Linder; Griffin T Morrisson; Laureano Rangel Latuche; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2021-03-13

2.  The impact of prior external beam radiation therapy on device outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery.

Authors:  Madeleine Grace Manka; Brian J Linder; Laureano J Rangel; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.