Literature DB >> 9592784

Differentiation of acute cortical and subcortical ischemic stroke by risk factors and clinical examination findings.

D Dulli1, D J D'Alessio, M Palta, R L Levine, H S Schutta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between acute cortical and subcortical ischemic stroke may be problematic when cortical stroke presents without obvious cortical deficits such as aphasia, neglect or hemianopia. This study explores stroke risk factors and clinical variables that may assist in this differentiation.
METHODS: Records of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke, examined within 72 h of symptom onset, were reviewed. Stroke type was verified by clinical course and follow-up imaging. Stroke risk factors and acute examination findings were compared by odds ratios and positive predictive values for cortical and subcortical stroke.
RESULTS: For 355 patients studied, 237 had cortical stroke and 118 had subcortical stroke. Odds ratios for cortical stroke were highest for atrial fibrillation by EKG (OR = 4.77, CI = 2.08-10.94), recent hospitalization (OR = 4.51, CI = 2.39-8.53) and nonalert mental status (OR = 4.50, CI = 2.29-8.87). Possible cardioembolic condition, ischemic heart disease and peripheral vascular disease were also significant, but hypertension, age and diabetes mellitus were not significantly different for the stroke subtypes. Cortical deficits were absent in 19.4% of cortical stroke patients on initial examination. Predictive models were generated based on the presence or absence of cortical deficits and the interaction of significant risk factors with degree of motor deficit.
CONCLUSIONS: There are clinical features that, in addition to initial examination, may help differentiate cortical from subcortical ischemic stroke. These features may be relevant to both diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to acute stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9592784     DOI: 10.1159/000026157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroepidemiology        ISSN: 0251-5350            Impact factor:   3.282


  5 in total

1.  Are lacunar strokes really different? A systematic review of differences in risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts.

Authors:  Caroline Jackson; Cathie Sudlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Necroptotic-Apoptotic Regulation in an Endothelin-1 Model of Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Chesarahmia Dojo Soeandy; Andrew J Elia; Yanshan Cao; Christopher Rodgers; Shudi Huang; Andrea C Elia; Jeffrey T Henderson
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  The AGES-Reykjavik Study suggests that change in kidney measures is associated with subclinical brain pathology in older community-dwelling persons.

Authors:  Sanaz Sedaghat; Jie Ding; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Mark A van Buchem; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; M Arfan Ikram; Osorio Meirelles; Vilmundur Gudnason; Andrew S Levey; Lenore J Launer
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Disrupted Rest-Activity Rhythms and Cerebral Small Vessel Disease Pathology in Older Adults.

Authors:  Rosa Sommer; Lei Yu; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Andrew S P Lim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 10.170

5.  The motor recovery related with brain lesion in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Kyung Bo Lee; Joon Sung Kim; Bo Young Hong; Young Dong Kim; Byong Yong Hwang; Seong Hoon Lim
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.