| Literature DB >> 25918457 |
Kyung Bo Lee1, Joon Sung Kim1, Bo Young Hong1, Young Dong Kim2, Byong Yong Hwang3, Seong Hoon Lim1.
Abstract
Although studies have demonstrated that several specific brain lesions are related to the severity of functional outcomes, the effects of specific brain lesions are not yet clear. This study investigated the effects of hemorrhagic stroke lesions on motor recovery. Eleven subjects with hemorrhagic stroke were assessed. Using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and functional ambulation category, clinical motor and sensory impairments were tested four times in total: initially within 2 weeks and 1, 3, and 6 months after the onset of stroke. Brain lesions and size were evaluated using MRIcron, SPM8, and Talairach Daemon software. Trunk control, motor function in the lower limbs, and sensory function improved significantly within 3 months, after which the change was no longer significant. Upper limb function and gait were unchanged within 1 month but improved significantly 3 months after onset and continued to improve for 6 months. Involvement of the anterior putamen, internal capsule, thalamus, periventricular white matter, and premotor cortex was related to poor upper limb recovery in patients with hemorrhagic stroke. These results should be useful for planning rehabilitation strategies and understanding the prognosis of hemorrhagic stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25918457 PMCID: PMC4395990 DOI: 10.1155/2015/258161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurol ISSN: 0953-4180 Impact factor: 3.342
Baseline characteristics and lesion size of subjects.
| Pt. | Paretic side | Sex | Age | Location/cause of lesion | Lesion volume (cm3) | Rehabilitation started |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rt. hemiplegia | M | 53 | ICH, BG, Lt. | 18.13 | 24 |
| 2 | Lt. hemiplegia | F | 68 | ICH, BG, Rt. | 30.78 | 17 |
| 3 | Rt. hemiplegia | F | 26 | ICH, T-P, Lt. | 50.59 | 21 |
| 4 | Rt. hemiplegia | F | 46 | ICH, BG, Lt. | 12.99 | 10 |
| 5 | Lt. hemiplegia | M | 33 | ICH, BG, Rt. | 20.27 | 24 |
| 6 | Lt. hemiplegia | M | 53 | ICH, thalamus, Rt. | 19.16 | 17 |
| 7 | Rt. hemiplegia | M | 29 | ICH, BG, Lt. | 52.57 | 20 |
| 8 | Lt. hemiplegia | M | 52 | ICH, BG, Rt. | 52.09 | 11 |
| 9 | Rt. hemiplegia | F | 70 | ICH, thalamus, Lt. | 14.67 | 22 |
| 10 | Lt. hemiplegia | M | 43 | ICH, BG, Rt. | 58.66 | 10 |
| 11 | Lt. hemiplegia | M | 58 | ICH, F-T, Rt. | 49.66 | 13 |
|
| ||||||
| 47.3 ± 15.1 | 34.51 ± 18.12 | 17.6 ± 5.6 | ||||
BG, basal ganglia; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; Lt., left; Rt., right; SD, standard deviation; T-P, temporoparietal; F-T, frontotemporal.
Values are given in mean ± standard deviation.
Clinical evaluations with time.
| The effect | Initial | 1 month | Pairwise comparison | 3 months | Pairwise comparison | 6 months | Pairwise comparison | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIS | <.001* | 5.3 ± 5.3 | 11.6 ± 4.2 | .005† | 16.7 ± 3.7 | .007† | 18.0 ± 3.1 | .027 |
| Upper limb | <.001* | 6.6 ± 6.2 | 10.0 ± 9.6 | .039 | 23.2 ± 18.2 | .003† | 25.8 ± 18.8 | .007† |
| Lower limb | <.001* | 7.4 ± 4.4 | 10.7 ± 6.0 | .017 | 18.3 ± 4.6 | .003† | 19.1 ± 4.0 | .336 |
| Sensory | <.001* | 2.4 ± 4.6 | 4.0 ± 4.9 | .066 | 11.6 ± 7.2 | .003† | 13.1 ± 8.1 | .235 |
| FAC | <.001* | 0 (0-0) | 0 (0-1) | .038 | 3 (3-4) | .003† | 4 (3–5) | .007† |
TIS, Trunk Impairment Scale, 0–23; upper limb, Fugl-Meyer Assessment arm section, 0–60; lower limb, Fugl-Meyer Assessment leg section, 0–28; sensory, Fugl-Meyer Assessment sensory section, 0–24; FAC, functional ambulation category, 0–5.
* P value < 0.05 was deemed to be significant.
† Post hoc analyses were conducted using a Bonferroni's correction (P < .0167).
The values of TIS, FMA arm, FMA leg, and sensory test are given in mean ± standard deviation.
The values of FAC are given in median (interquartile).
Figure 1Overlay of lesions for patients with hemorrhagic stroke. Voxels damaged in 1 patient are shown in purple and shades toward the red end of spectrum denote voxels where larger numbers of patients were lesioned.
Figure 2Overlay of lesions in the patients with hemorrhagic stroke. The top two figures represent the subject's upper limb motor function. The bottom shows the subtraction analysis in which the overlay of patients with isolated movement recovery was subtracted from the overlay of those with mass synergic movement recovery. (a) Overlay of lesions for patients with a synergic upper limb (n = 6). (b) Overlay of lesions for patients with an isolated upper limb (n = 5). (c) Subtraction analysis using (a) and (b).