Literature DB >> 9591501

Chromosome abnormalities in embryos obtained after conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

S Munné1, C Márquez, A Reing, J Garrisi, M Alikani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of numerical chromosome abnormalities in embryos derived from bipronucleated zygotes produced by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and conventional IVF.
DESIGN: Embryos were classified by maternal age and morphological and developmental characteristics to avoid bias when comparing chromosome abnormalities in ICSI and IVF embryos.
SETTING: The Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of Saint Barnabas Medical Center, West Orange, New Jersey. PATIENT(S): Seventy-nine couples undergoing IVF and 53 couples undergoing ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): Embryos donated for research were fully biopsied, and their cells were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with specific probes for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 and some with also a probe for chromosome 16. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Embryo chromosome abnormalities. RESULT(S): A total of 245 embryos obtained through conventional IVF and 136 embryos obtained through ICSI were analyzed. There were no statistical differences between the rates of numerical chromosomal abnormalities detected in the IVF (61%) and ICSI (52%) embryos analyzed. Regarding gonosomal aneuploidy, the same rate was found in both ICSI (1%) and IVF groups (2%). CONCLUSION(S): If the parents are chromosomally normal, the results indicate that, at the embryo level and before any embryo selection has occurred in utero, ICSI does not produce more numerical chromosomal abnormalities than conventional IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9591501     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00039-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  Multilocus genetic analysis of single interphase cells by spectral imaging.

Authors:  J Fung; H U Weier; J D Goldberg; R A Pedersen
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Assisted reproductive technologies do not alter mutation frequency or spectrum.

Authors:  Lee Caperton; Patricia Murphey; Yukiko Yamazaki; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; Ryuzo Yanagimachi; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Down syndrome pregnancy.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Chen-ming Xu; Yi-min Zhu; Min-yue Dong; Yu-li Qian; Fan Jin; He-feng Huang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.066

5.  Further evidence of the safety of assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Zev Rosenwaks; Kristin Bendikson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Chromosomal mosaicism in mouse two-cell embryos after paternal exposure to acrylamide.

Authors:  Francesco Marchetti; Jack Bishop; Xiu Lowe; Andrew J Wyrobek
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Beneficial effect of long zona dissection on frozen-thawed blastocysts at a young age.

Authors:  Setsuko Yamamoto; Michiko Umeki; Mioko Kodoma; Teruhiro Hamano; Fujiyo Matsusita
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2007-11-07

8.  Quantitative decision-making in preimplantation genetic (aneuploidy) screening (PGS).

Authors:  Michael C Summers; Andrew D Foland
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Identification of embryonic chromosomal abnormality using FISH-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Ying-hui Ye; Chen-ming Xu; Fan Jin; Yu-li Qian
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci       Date:  2004-10

10.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for a Chinese family with autosomal recessive Meckel-Gruber syndrome type 3 (MKS3).

Authors:  Yanping Lu; Hongmei Peng; Zhanguo Jin; Jing Cheng; Shufang Wang; Minyue Ma; Yu Lu; Dongyi Han; Yuanqing Yao; Yali Li; Huijun Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.