Literature DB >> 9590535

The effect of recipient oocyte volume on nuclear transfer in cattle.

T T Peura1, I M Lewis, A O Trounson.   

Abstract

This study compared the developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer embryos with varying amounts of cytoplasm. Embryos formed from single cytoplasts fused to blastomeres by a single electrical pulse or from double cytoplasts using a double electrical pulse resulted in reconstituted embryos containing 75% and 150% of the original oocyte volume. No differences in fusion, cleavage, or development rates to blastocysts were observed between the groups. Mean cell numbers 2 days after fusion were significantly lower in single-cytoplast clones. Cell numbers of resulting blastocysts were likewise significantly lower in single-cytoplast clones. Embryos formed by fusion of blastomeres with single cytoplasts using a single electrical pulse or from double cytoplasts using either a single or a double pulse resulted in reconstituted embryos containing 50%, 100% and 100% of the original oocyte volume. Again, no differences in fusion or cleavage rates were observed between groups, but the development to blastocysts at day 7 was significantly higher in double cytoplasts constructed with one fusion pulse than in single cytoplasts (P < 0.05). Mean cell numbers 2 days after fusion were significantly lower in single-cytoplast clones (P < 0.05), but at the blastocyst stage, no statistically significant differences in cell numbers were observed. The results of this study show that cytoplasmic volume plays a role in the development of nuclear transfer embryos. When using crude enucleation methods such as oocyte bisection, normal cytoplasmic volumes can be achieved by fusing double cytoplasts with embryonic blastomeres.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9590535     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199806)50:2<185::AID-MRD9>3.0.CO;2-G

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev        ISSN: 1040-452X            Impact factor:   2.609


  10 in total

1.  Simple, fast, and efficient method of manual oocyte enucleation using a pulled Pasteur pipette.

Authors:  S M Hosseini; F Moulavi; V Asgari; A Shirazi; A H Abazari-Kia; H R Ghanaei; M H Nasr-Esfahani
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  A comparative study on the efficiency of two enucleation methods in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer: effects of the squeezing and the aspiration methods.

Authors:  Eunsong Lee; Jose Estrada; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.282

3.  Early development of cloned bovine embryos produced from oocytes enucleated by fluorescence metaphase II imaging using a conventional halogen-lamp microscope.

Authors:  Daisaku Iwamoto; Kazuo Yamagata; Masao Kishi; Yoko Hayashi-Takanaka; Hiroshi Kimura; Teruhiko Wakayama; Kazuhiro Saeki
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.987

4.  Mitochondrial physiology and gene expression analyses reveal metabolic and translational dysregulation in oocyte-induced somatic nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Telma C Esteves; Olympia E Psathaki; Martin J Pfeiffer; Sebastian T Balbach; Dagmar Zeuschner; Hiroshi Shitara; Hiromichi Yonekawa; Marcin Siatkowski; Georg Fuellen; Michele Boiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Handmade cloning: recent advances, potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Geetika Verma; J S Arora; R S Sethi; C S Mukhopadhyay; Ramneek Verma
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-15

6.  Improves the In Vitro Developmental Competence and Reprogramming Efficiency of Cloned Bovine Embryos by Additional Complimentary Cytoplasm.

Authors:  Lianguang Xu; Ayman Mesalam; Kyeong-Lim Lee; Seok-Hwan Song; Imran Khan; M M R Chowdhury; Wenfa Lv; Il-Keun Kong
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 7.  Strategies to Improve the Efficiency of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.

Authors:  Kanokwan Srirattana; Masahiro Kaneda; Rangsun Parnpai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Appleby; Pavla Misica-Turner; Fleur Catherine Oback; Arindam Dhali; Zachariah Louis McLean; Björn Oback
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Effect of demecolcine-assisted enucleation on the MPF level and cyclin B1 distribution in porcine oocytes.

Authors:  Suo Li; Jin-Dan Kang; Jun-Xue Jin; Yu Hong; Hai-Ying Zhu; Long Jin; Qing-Shan Gao; Chang-Guo Yan; Cheng-Du Cui; Wen-Xue Li; Xi-Jun Yin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The transgenic cloned pig population with integrated and controllable GH expression that has higher feed efficiency and meat production.

Authors:  Huiming Ju; Jiaqing Zhang; Lijing Bai; Yulian Mu; Yutao Du; Wenxian Yang; Yong Li; Anzhi Sheng; Kui Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.