| Literature DB >> 30735075 |
Lianguang Xu1, Ayman Mesalam1,2, Kyeong-Lim Lee1, Seok-Hwan Song1, Imran Khan1, M M R Chowdhury1,3, Wenfa Lv4, Il-Keun Kong1,5.
Abstract
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is a useful technology; however, its efficiency is low. In this study, we investigated the effects of cytoplasmic transfer into enucleated oocytes on the developmental competence and quality of cloned preimplantation bovine embryos via terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling, quantitative reverse transcription PCR, and immunocytochemistry. We used cytoplasm injection cloning technology (CICT), a new technique via which the cytoplasmic volume of an enucleated oocyte could be restored by injecting ∼30% of the cytoplasm of a donor oocyte. The percentages of embryos that underwent cleavage and formed a blastocyst were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the CICT group than in the SCNT group (28.9 ± 0.8% vs. 20.2 ± 1.3%, respectively). Furthermore, the total cell number per day 8 blastocyst was significantly higher in the CICT group than in the SCNT group (176.2 ± 6.5 vs. 119.3 ± 7.7, p < 0.05). Moreover, CICT increased mitochondrial activity, as detected using MitoTracker® Green. The mRNA levels of DNA methyltransferase 1 and DNA methyltransferase 3a were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the CICT group than in the SCNT group. The mRNA level of DNA methyltransferase 3b was lower in the CICT group than in the SCNT group; however, this difference was not significant (p > 0.05). Taken together, these data suggest that CICT improves the in vitro developmental competence and quality of cloned bovine embryos.Entities:
Keywords: bovine; cytoplasm injection cloning technology; embryo quality; reprogramming efficiency; somatic cell nuclear transfer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30735075 PMCID: PMC6383574 DOI: 10.1089/cell.2018.0050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Reprogram ISSN: 2152-4971 Impact factor: 1.987

Schematic diagram of CICT. (A) Skin cells were collected from a donor cow and cultured in vitro. (B) Matured oocytes were enucleated. (C) The donor cell and oocyte cytoplasm (green) were injected into the enucleated recipient oocyte (orange). (D) The reconstructed oocytes were fused, and presumed cloned embryos were allowed to develop to the blastocyst stage in vitro. CICT, cytoplasm injection cloning technology. Color images available online.
Primer Sequences for Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR
| F: AGGGAGACGTGGAGATGCTG | AY244709 | 194 | |
| R: CATGGAGCGCTTGAAGGAG | |||
| F: AGACATGTGGGTTGAACCCG | AY271298 | 188 | |
| R: GGCTCCCACAAGAGATGCAG | |||
| F: CAGGATGGGAAGGAGTTTGGA | AY244710 | 151 | |
| R: CACCAAACCACTGGACCCAC | |||
| F: CCCAGAATATCATCCCTGCT | NM_001034034 | 185 | |
| R: CTGCTTCACCACCTTCTTGA |
GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; DNMT3a, DNA methyltransferase 3a; DNMT3b, DNA methyltransferase 3b; F, forward; R, reverse.
In Vitro Development of Embryos Cloned Using Different Methods
| IVF | 258 | — | — | 219 (85.0 ± 1.5)[ | 194 (75.4 ± 1.3)[ | 80 (31.1 ± 1.1)[ |
| SCNT | — | 558 | 381 (68.3 ± 1.5)[ | 303 (79.5 ± 1.4)[ | 148 (39.7 ± 2.1)[ | 74 (20.2 ± 1.3)[ |
| CICT | — | 296 | 243 (82.0 ± 0.3)[ | 200 (82.0 ± 1.7)[ | 149 (61.5 ± 1.3)[ | 70 (28.9 ± 0.8)[ |
Mean ± standard error of the mean.
Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fusion rates were calculated based on the number of injected oocytes.
Cleavage rates were calculated based on the number of fused embryos for SCNT, CICT and based on the number of fertilized zygote for IVF.
Blastocyst development rates were calculated based on the number of fused embryos for SCNT and CICT and based on the number of presumed zygote for IVF.
SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; CICT, cytoplasm injection cloning technology; IVF, in vitro fertilization.
Characterization of Day 8 Blastocysts
| IVF | 15 | 184.1 ± 8.7[ | 4.4 ± 0.2[ |
| SCNT | 15 | 119.3 ± 7.7[ | 4.1 ± 0.3[ |
| CICT | 15 | 176.2 ± 6.5[ | 3.5 ± 0.4[ |
Values with different superscript in the same columns are significantly different (p < 0.05).

TUNEL of day 8 blastocysts in the IVF, SCNT, and CICT groups. Apoptotic cells were detected by TUNEL (red). Each sample was counterstained with Hoechst 33342 to visualize cell nuclei (blue). White arrows indicate apoptotic cells. Scale bar = 100 μm. TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling. SCNT, somatic cell nuclear transfer; IVF, in vitro fertilization. Color images available online.

Fluorescence intensity of mitochondrial staining in day 8 blastocysts. (A) MitoTracker® Green FM was used to label mitochondria (green). Nuclei were labeled with Hoechst 33342 (blue). Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Fluorescence intensity of mitochondrial staining per blastocyst. Columns with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). Fluorescence intensities are expressed as arbitrary units ± standard errors of the mean. Color images available online.

Fluorescence intensity of mitochondrial staining in CICT blastocysts. MitoTracker Green FM staining of donor cytoplasm (A–C) and total cytoplasm (A′–C′) in CICT group. Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Mean values of the integrated optical density of mitochondrial staining per blastocyst. Columns with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.01). Color images available online.

Relative mRNA expression levels of DNMT genes in blastocysts determined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Relative mRNA expression levels of DNMT1 (A), DNMT3a (B), and DNMT3b (C) in blastocysts from the IVF, SCNT, and CICT groups. Columns with different superscripts are significantly different (p < 0.05). DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; DNMT3a, DNA methyltransferase 3a; DNMT3b, DNA methyltransferase 3b.