Literature DB >> 9588923

A dose-response study for I-125 prostate implants.

R G Stock1, N N Stone, A Tabert, C Iannuzzi, J K DeWyngaert.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: No dose-response study has ever been performed for I-125 prostate implants using modern techniques of implant evaluation and modern treatment outcome end points. The amount of activity per volume implanted was increased over time based on review of postimplant dosimetry. This resulted in different delivered dose levels. This study explores the relationship between dose, biochemical failure, and biopsy results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 134 patients with T1-T2 prostate cancer were implanted with I-125 radioactive seeds and followed from 12 to 74 months (median: 32) postimplant. No patient received external beam irradiation or hormonal therapy. All patients implanted with I-125 had Gleason scores < or =6. One month postimplant, a CT-based three-dimensional dosimetric evaluation was performed on all patients. Using TG43 guidelines, dose-volume histograms were calculated. The dose delivered to the gland was defined as the D90 (dose delivered to 90% of prostate tissue as defined by CT). The D90s ranged from 26.8 to 256.3 Gy (median: 140.8 Gy). Biochemical failure was defined as two consecutive rises in prostate specific antigen (PSA) or a nadir level above 1.0 ng/ml. Posttreatment prostate biopsies (six to eight core samples) were routinely performed at 2 years postimplant.
RESULTS: Improvements in freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF) rates were seen with increasing D90 levels. The 4-year FFBF rates for patients with D90 values < 100 Gy, 100-119.9 Gy, 120-13.9 Gy, 140-159.9 Gy, and > or =160 Gy were 53, 82, 80, 95, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients receiving a D90 < 140 Gy (65 patients) were similar with respect to presenting disease prognostic factors to those receiving a D90 > or =140 Gy (69 patients). Patients receiving a D90 < 140 Gy had a 4-year FFBF rate of 68% compared to a rate of 92% for those receiving a D90 > or =140 Gy (p = 0.02). Two-year posttreatment biopsies were negative in 70% (33 of 47) of patients with a D90 < 140 Gy compared to a rate of 83% (24 of 29) in patients with a D90 > or =140 Gy (p = 0.2). A multivariate analysis using dose, PSA, score, and stage revealed that dose was the most significant predictor of biochemical failure (p = 0.001). This dose response was more pronounced in patients presenting with PSA levels > 10 ng/ml. In these patients, the 4-year FFBF rates were 51 and 100% for the low and high dose groups, respectively (p = 0.009) and the negative biopsy rates were 64% (14 of 22) and 100% (8 of 8), respectively (p = 0.05). In patients with presenting PSA <10 ng/ml, the 4-year FFBF rates were 82 and 88% for the low and high dose groups, respectively (p = 0.29).
CONCLUSION: A dose response was observed at a level of 140 Gy. Adequate I-125 implants should deliver a dose of 140-160 Gy using TG43 guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9588923     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  56 in total

1.  Institutional patient accrual volume and the treatment quality of I‑125 prostate seed implantation in a Japanese nationwide prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katsumasa Nakamura; Saiji Ohga; Atsunori Yorozu; Shiro Saito; Takashi Kikuchi; Takushi Dokiya; Masanori Fukushima; Hidetoshi Yamanaka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Permanent prostate brachytherapy: the significance of postimplant dosimetry.

Authors:  W Robert Lee
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

3.  A systematic evaluation of the dose-rate constant determined by photon spectrometry for 21 different models of low-energy photon-emitting brachytherapy sources.

Authors:  Zhe Jay Chen; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Radical retropubic prostatectomy versus brachytherapy for low-risk prostatic cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  C Giberti; L Chiono; Fabrizio Gallo; M Schenone; E Gastaldi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Biochemical control of prostate cancer with iodine-125 brachytherapy alone: experience from a single institution.

Authors:  Larissa Pereira da Ponte Amadei; João Luis Fernandes Silva; Samir Abdallah Hanna; Cecília Maria Kalil Haddad; Adriano João Nesrallah; Heloisa Andrade Carvalho
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Results from the Quality Research in Radiation Oncology (QRRO) survey: Evaluation of dosimetric outcomes for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Gil'ad N Cohen; Walter R Bosch; Lisa Morikawa; Najma Khalid; Cheryl L Crozier; W Robert Lee; Anthony Zietman; Jean Owen; J Frank Wilson; Phillip M Devlin
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  On the need to compensate for edema-induced dose reductions in preplanned (131)Cs prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Z Jay Chen; Jun Deng; Kenneth Roberts; Ravinder Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Georgios Koukourakis; Nikolaos Kelekis; Vassilios Armonis; Vassilios Kouloulias
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-09-01

10.  Cold spot mapping inferred from MRI at time of failure predicts biopsy-proven local failure after permanent seed brachytherapy in prostate cancer patients: implications for focal salvage brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gilles Crehange; Devan Krishnamurthy; J Adam Cunha; Barby Pickett; John Kurhanewicz; I-Chow Hsu; Alexander R Gottschalk; Katsuto Shinohara; Mack Roach; Jean Pouliot
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.