Literature DB >> 9588674

Nuclear cardiology in a managed care environment.

G S Thomas, D Wolin.   

Abstract

Health maintenance organizations (HMO) and nuclear cardiology represent mutual threats and mutual opportunities for each other. On the one hand, nuclear cardiology represents a cost center with HMOs exerting tremendous financial pressure on nuclear cardiology programs. On the other hand, nuclear cardiology can act as a sage gatekeeper to the cardiac catheterization laboratory and help HMOs effectively control the health care of an increasing percentage of the population. Through the process of negotiation, of determining each other's needs, an accommodation can take place between the two. The ability to correlate scan results with coronary angiography provides individual nuclear cardiology programs with the opportunity to demonstrate their accuracy. A Nuclear Cardiology Report Card based on these data can be developed for use, with HMOs creating the opportunity to compete not only on price but also on value. Carved out capitation rates for nuclear cardiology can be estimated on the basis of actual experience with an HMO population and by extrapolation from test frequency of the U.S. population. The financial disincentives of capitation and of managed care challenge the physician-patient relationship. Advocacy of the role of nuclear cardiology and an understanding of negotiation strategies can aid nuclear cardiologists in their attempts to provide quality care with commensurate compensation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9588674     DOI: 10.1016/s1071-3581(98)90205-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  15 in total

1.  Implications of nuclear cardiology as a gatekeeper.

Authors:  B L Zaret
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  ACC/AHA Guidelines for Exercise Testing. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Exercise Testing).

Authors:  R J Gibbons; G J Balady; J W Beasley; J T Bricker; W F Duvernoy; V F Froelicher; D B Mark; T H Marwick; B D McCallister; P D Thompson; W L Winters; F G Yanowitz; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; K A Eagle; T J Gardner; A Garson; R P Lewis; R A O'Rourke; T J Ryan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Nuclear cardiology in hospital-based practice.

Authors:  R Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Design and implementation of a nuclear cardiology testing facility in a private-practice cardiology office setting.

Authors:  T M Bateman; J H O'Keefe; M E Williams
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Evaluation of ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion, wall thickening, and other parameters with gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  D S Berman; G Germano
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Journal of Nuclear Cardiology Nuclear Cardiology News Update.

Authors:  M D Cerqueira; J F Batista; L Prvulovich; N Vita; K C Allman; N Zafrir; N Tamaki; L Prvulovich; R C Hendel; D D Miller; F M Prigent
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Managed care and the morality of the marketplace.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-07-06       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Preserving the physician-patient relationship in the era of managed care.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; N N Dubler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-01-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Nuclear cardiology in private practice.

Authors:  T M Bateman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  The effect of managed care on nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  M E Michnich; P S Mills; J J Seidman
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

View more
  2 in total

1.  A normal stress SPECT scan is an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography.

Authors:  Todd D Miller; David O Hodge; James J Milavetz; Raymond J Gibbons
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  What to do with an equivocal myocardial perfusion study?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 5.952

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.