Literature DB >> 958852

Intergration and interruption in the masking of form by form.

T Bachmann, J Allik.   

Abstract

Paris of geometric forms of equal area were presented, one form after another, with interstimulus intervals t ranging from 0 to 250 ms. The subject's task in experiment 1 was to recognise both stimuli. Identification of the form presented first (backward masking) across all values of t was of a nonmonotonic nature, with greatest impairment at values of t from 30 to 60 ms. Identification of the second form presented (forward masking) increased monotonically with increasing t. Different forms were recognised with different effectiveness across all values of t where masking took place. The results are interpreted on the basis of a multiple-stage processing model which assumes interaction between stimuli at different levels at different values of t. In experiment 2 the subject's task was to detect the presence or absence of a predesignated form. This condition yielded monotonic functions for both backward and forward masking. An explanation in terms of attention-dependent masking is given.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 958852     DOI: 10.1068/p050079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  10 in total

1.  The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control.

Authors:  Jun-Ichiro Kawahara; Takatsune Kumada; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

2.  Behind the mask: the influence of mask-type on amygdala response to fearful faces.

Authors:  M Justin Kim; Rebecca A Loucks; Maital Neta; F Caroline Davis; Jonathan A Oler; Emily C Mazzulla; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Central sources of visual masking: indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.

Authors:  C F Michaels; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1979

4.  The process of perceptual retouch: nonspecific afferent activation dynamics in explaining visual masking.

Authors:  T Bachmann
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-01

5.  Visual attention and the mechanism of metacontrast.

Authors:  Odmar Neumann; Ingrid Scharlau
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-06-08

6.  Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Peter Hofmann
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

7.  Visual similarity in masking and priming: The critical role of task relevance.

Authors:  James T Enns; Chris Oriet
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

8.  Binding binding: Departure points for a different version of the perceptual retouch theory.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

9.  It is time to combine the two main traditions in the research on the neural correlates of consciousness: C = L × D.

Authors:  Talis Bachmann; Anthony G Hudetz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-22

10.  A face versus non-face context influences amygdala responses to masked fearful eye whites.

Authors:  M Justin Kim; Kimberly M Solomon; Maital Neta; F Caroline Davis; Jonathan A Oler; Emily C Mazzulla; Paul J Whalen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.436

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.