Literature DB >> 9588504

Management of upper extremity central venous obstruction using interventional radiology.

P G Kalman1, T F Lindsay, K Clarke, K W Sniderman, L Vanderburgh.   

Abstract

Upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion is responsible for significant morbidity. The objective of this report is to review our management using interventional radiological techniques and to determine the long-term clinical results. All radiological interventions for central vein stenosis/occlusion (n = 59) between July 1991 and July 1996 at our institution were reviewed. The interventions consisted of thrombolytic therapy alone in 10 cases, PTA in 40 cases (combined with initial thrombolytic therapy in 6 cases), and deployment of a venous stent in 9 cases. At follow-up, the cumulative success (patency and relief of symptoms) was determined (Kaplan-Meier method). The involved vein was the subclavian, axillary, or innominate (SUB-AX-INN) in 45 cases and the superior vena cava (SVC) in 14 cases. The etiology was secondary to an indwelling foreign body (catheter, pacemaker lead) in 53 cases (90%), and spontaneous in only 6 cases (10%). The average follow-up after intervention was 17.2 months, with a cumulative success of 70 +/- 7.5% at 2 years, with rapid decline thereafter. Analysis of the failure quantiles revealed that 25% failed by 17 months, 50% failed by 26.6 months, and 75% failed by 33.8 months. There were no subgroup differences (log-rank test) for stenosis versus occlusion (p = 0.526), SUB-AX-INN versus SVC (p = 0.744), or if the intervention was begun < 5 days versus > or =5 days after symptom onset (p = 0.240), or whether or not a stent was deployed (p = 0.893). Interventional radiological techniques should be considered when symptoms from upper extremity central vein stenosis/occlusion are severe and disabling, or when veno-access or maintenance of patency of an ipsilateral arteriovenous (A-V) access is necessary. These results suggest an acceptable short-to medium-term solution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9588504     DOI: 10.1007/s100169900141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

Review 1.  Venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators.

Authors:  Grzegorz Rozmus; James P Daubert; David T Huang; Spencer Rosero; Burr Hall; Charles Francis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Percutaneous stenting of bilateral central venous occlusions in a hemodialysis patient.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Murasato; Takuo Tsurugi; Kinya Hiroshige; Fumihiko Kamezaki; Hiroshi Suzuka; Kiyoshi Kawanami; Yoshiyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Venous Obstruction in Cardiac Rhythm Device Therapy.

Authors:  Joseph Donnelly; James Gabriels; Andrew Galmer; Jonathan Willner; Stuart Beldner; Laurence M Epstein; Apoor Patel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-11

4.  A case of pacing lead induced clinical superior vena cava syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Mukesh Singh; Sabry K Talab
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-06-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.