Literature DB >> 9586873

BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women.

M Robson1, T Gilewski, B Haas, D Levin, P Borgen, P Rajan, Y Hirschaut, P Pressman, P P Rosen, M L Lesser, L Norton, K Offit.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To delineate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of breast cancer that arises in the setting of a germline BRCA mutation and to compare BRCA-associated breast cancers (BABC) with those that arise in women without mutations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the clinical records of 91 Ashkenazi Jewish women ascertained during studies of the genetics of early-onset breast cancer. All women underwent testing for the BRCA1 mutations 185delAG and 5382insC. After the discovery of BRCA2, 79 women were also tested for the BRCA2 mutation 6174delT.
RESULTS: Mutations were identified in 30 women (33%). BABC were less likely to present with stage I disease than cases in women without mutations (27% v 46%), more likely to have axillary nodal involvement (54% v46%), and more likely to have extensive axillary involvement (25% v 17%). These differences were not statistically significant. BABC were significantly more likely to be histologic grade III (100% v 59%, P=.04) and to be estrogen receptor-negative (70% v 34%, P=.04). In the entire cohort, there were no significant differences between BABC and non-BRCA-associated cancers in 5-year relapse-free survival (65% v 69%, P=not significant [NS]), 5-year event-free survival (57% v 68%, P=NS), or 5-year overall survival. However, among cases diagnosed within 2 years of study entry, there was a trend toward shorter event-free survival in BRCA heterozygotes, but not relapse-free survival. Women with germline BRCA mutations were significantly more likely to develop contralateral breast cancer at 5 years (31% v 4%, P=.0007).
CONCLUSION: BABC present with adverse clinical and histopathologic features when compared with cases not associated with BRCA mutations. However, the prognosis of BABC appears to be similar to that of nonassociated cancer. Further studies of incident cases are necessary to define the independent prognostic significance of germline BRCA mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9586873     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.5.1642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  65 in total

Review 1.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Immediate reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: one option for young breast cancer patients with early stage disease.

Authors:  Rachel L Yang; Rachel R Kelz; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  ATM, radiation, and the risk of second primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Jonine L Bernstein; Patrick Concannon
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.694

4.  Population-based study of the risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Authors:  Kathleen E Malone; Colin B Begg; Robert W Haile; Ake Borg; Patrick Concannon; Lina Tellhed; Shanyan Xue; Sharon Teraoka; Leslie Bernstein; Marinela Capanu; Anne S Reiner; Elyn R Riedel; Duncan C Thomas; Lene Mellemkjaer; Charles F Lynch; John D Boice; Hoda Anton-Culver; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Absence of CCND1 gene amplification in breast tumours of BRCA1 mutation carriers.

Authors:  S A Vaziri; R R Tubbs; G Darlington; G Casey
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-08

Review 6.  BRCA1 Mutation: A Predictive Marker for Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Charlene Kan; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Estrogen receptor positive breast cancers in BRCA1 mutation carriers: clinical risk factors and pathologic features.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Yihong Wang; Laura C Collins; Jennifer Kaplan; Hailun Li; Rebecca Gelman; Amy H Comander; Bridget Gallagher; Katharina Fetten; Karen Krag; Kathryn A Stoeckert; Robert D Legare; Dennis Sgroi; Paula D Ryan; Judy E Garber; Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  An audit of screening for familial breast cancer before 50 years in the South Thames Region - have we got it right?

Authors:  Victoria Murday; R Pears; J Ball; R Eeles; S Hodgson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Familial breast cancer: an investigation into the outcome of treatment for early stage disease.

Authors:  D Eccles; P Simmonds; J Goddard; M Coultas; S Hodgson; F Lalloo; G Evans; N Haites
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Genetic counselling and testing for inherited gene mutations in newly diagnosed patients with breast cancer: a review of the existing literature and a proposed research agenda.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Kathy Tucker; Michael Friedlander; Kristine Barlow-Stewart; Elizabeth Lobb; Christobel Saunders; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.