Literature DB >> 15131403

An audit of screening for familial breast cancer before 50 years in the South Thames Region - have we got it right?

Victoria Murday1, R Pears, J Ball, R Eeles, S Hodgson.   

Abstract

We have carried out an audit of breast screening by mammography under 50 years of age in a cohort of 192 women attending family cancer clinics run by the South Thames genetic services. Of these women, six came from families in which a BRCA mutation had been identified, 61 had > 50%, 35 a 20-50% and 90 had < 20% chance of carrying a high risk mutation. In the 192 women in the screened cohort, 9 breast cancers were diagnosed (4.7%), all in high-risk women. Three were diagnosed at the prevalence screen. Three were detected mammographically at subsequent screening rounds; three were detected by breast self-examination (BSE) between screening episodes. One interval cancer was visible on mammogram at presentation but not at screening five months previously. A second cancer was also visible on mammogram at presentation but the normal screening mammogram had been 17 months earlier, outside the recommended interval. The remaining interval cancer was not visible on the mammogram. A total of 363 two-view screening mammograms were performed in the 280 person-years of follow-up; 109 additional investigations were generated: 23 recall mammograms, 18 symptomatic mammograms, 45 ultrasounds, 12 aspiration cytologies and 11 biopsies. Cytology diagnosed malignancy in 1 of 12 cases; breast biopsy in 9 of 11 cases. Twenty-three additional women had ultrasound screening only. This audit suggests that screening below the age 50 years may be unnecessary in families with a low chance of having a BRCA1 or -2 mutation, but it is important to screen high-risk women at least annually and possibly under 35 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15131403     DOI: 10.1023/B:FAME.0000026818.34049.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  23 in total

1.  BRCA-associated breast cancer in young women.

Authors:  M Robson; T Gilewski; B Haas; D Levin; P Borgen; P Rajan; Y Hirschaut; P Pressman; P P Rosen; M L Lesser; L Norton; K Offit
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 2.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium.

Authors:  W Burke; M Daly; J Garber; J Botkin; M J Kahn; P Lynch; A McTiernan; K Offit; J Perlman; G Petersen; E Thomson; C Varricchio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Pathology of familial breast cancer: differences between breast cancers in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.

Authors:  E Warner; D B Plewes; R S Shumak; G C Catzavelos; L S Di Prospero; M J Yaffe; V Goel; E Ramsay; P L Chart; D E Cole; G A Taylor; M Cutrara; T H Samuels; J P Murphy; J M Murphy; S A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  F E Alexander; T J Anderson; H K Brown; A P Forrest; W Hepburn; A E Kirkpatrick; B B Muir; R J Prescott; A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Current policies for surveillance and management in women at risk of breast and ovarian cancer: a survey among 16 European family cancer clinics. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

Authors:  H F Vasen; N E Haites; D G Evans; C M Steel; P Møller; S Hodgson; D Eccles; P Morrison; D Stoppa Lyonet; J Chang-Claude; M Caligo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  First-degree relatives of breast-cancer patients: cognitive perceptions, coping, and adherence to breast self-examination.

Authors:  Miri Cohen
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.104

8.  Screening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  F Lalloo; C R Boggis; D G Evans; A Shenton; A G Threlfall; A Howell
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Survival and tumour characteristics of breast-cancer patients with germline mutations of BRCA1.

Authors:  L C Verhoog; C T Brekelmans; C Seynaeve; L M van den Bosch; G Dahmen; A N van Geel; M M Tilanus-Linthorst; C C Bartels; A Wagner; A van den Ouweland; P Devilee; E J Meijers-Heijboer; J G Klijn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Efficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast cancer. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group.

Authors:  P Møller; M M Reis; G Evans; H Vasen; N Haites; E Anderson; C M Steel; J Apold; F Lalloo; L Maehle; P Preece; H Gregory; K Heimdal
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.434

View more
  1 in total

1.  Outcomes of multimodality breast screening for women at increased risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Ian C Bennett; Jennifer Muller; Linda Cockburn; Helen Joshua; Gillian Thorley; Christine Baker; Nili Wood; Jane Brazier; Mark Jones; Nathan Dunn; Michael Gattas
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.