Literature DB >> 9584303

Failure of third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillators to abort shock therapy for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia due to shortcomings of the VF confirmation algorithm.

W Grimm1, V Menz, J Hoffmann, B Maisch.   

Abstract

Unnecessary shocks by ICDs for rhythms other than sustained VT or VF have been described as the most frequent adverse event in ICD patients. To avoid unnecessary shocks for self-terminating arrhythmias, the third-generation Jewel PCD defibrillators 7202, 7219, and 7220 Plus use a specially designed VF confirmation algorithm after charge end. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of this VF confirmation algorithm to recognize nonsustained VT, and to analyze the reasons for failure of the PCD device to abort shock therapy for nonsustained VT despite use of this VF confirmation algorithm. Analysis of stored electrograms of electrical events triggering high voltage capacitor charging in the programmed VF zone of the device showed 36 spontaneous episodes of nonsustained VT (227 +/- 21 beats/min) during 18 +/- 7 months follow-up in 15 patients who had a Jewel PCD implanted at our hospital. Intracardiac electrogram recordings and simultaneously retrieved marker channels demonstrated that the ICD shock was appropriately aborted according to the VF confirmation algorithm in 24 (67%) of 36 episodes of nonsustained VT. Twelve episodes (33%) of nonsustained VT, however, were followed by spontaneous ICD shock in 6 (40%) of the 15 study patients. The only reason for all 12 shocks for sustained VT was the inability of the device to recognize the absence of VT after charge end due to shortcomings of the VF confirmation algorithm: 11 of the 12 shocks for nonsustained VT were triggered by the occurrence of paced beats during the VF confirmation period and 1 shock for nonsustained VT was triggered by the occurrence of 2 premature beats after charge end. Thus, better VF confirmation algorithms need to be incorporated in future PCD devices to avoid unnecessary shocks for nonsustained VT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584303     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00129.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock: appropriate or inappropriate?

Authors:  Michael A Nault; William F McIntyre; Christopher S Simpson; Damian P Redfearn; Hoshiar Abdollah; F James Brennan; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  A review of the confirmation algorithm and related timing cycles of St. Jude ICDs.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Roland X Stroobandt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-08-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.