Literature DB >> 9584238

Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus.

J H Krumeich1, J Daniel, A Knülle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical feasibility of refractive live-epikeratophakia (L-EPI) for early keratoconus to cap, rather than reverse, the ectatic cornea.
SETTING: Eye Department, Martin-Luther-Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
METHODS: Twenty-seven consecutive cases with keratoconus stage I-II had L-EPI. Lenticules were obtained from eye-bank eyes. The lenticules were cut on the artificial anterior chamber bench of the Barraquer-Krumeich-Swinger set. Optical power was generated over refractive dies to achieve postoperative emmetropia. The lenticule was sutured into a peripherally undermined 7.0 mm trephination with a double-running torque suture.
RESULTS: Re-epithelialization was complete within 4 to 6 days. In all but three cases that had corneal ulcers and experienced partial melting of tissue following severe neurodermatitis, all lenticules remained stable during the 10 year follow-up. The 1 month spherical equivalent remained almost stable over the entire follow-up. There was no sign of progression of keratoconus as induced myopia or astigmatism indicated by keratometry readings. Mean best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.45 (n = 27) preoperatively and 0.19 (n = 25) at 1 week, 0.39 (n = 26) at 1 month, 0.53 (n = 20) at 6 months, 0.58 (n = 13) at 1 year, and 0.64 (n = 8) at 2 years. Preoperative BCVA was achieved or improved in 13 eyes at 1 month. Postoperative astigmatism was < or = 3.25 diopters. Neither rejection nor lenticule opacification was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Live-epikeratophakia is a safe and minimally invasive extraocular procedure suitable for keratoconus stage I-II. Progression of keratoconus may be arrested. If unsuccessful, the procedure is complementable and there is no interference with a later penetrating keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9584238     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(98)80284-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  59 in total

1.  Contrast and glare testing in keratoconus and after penetrating keratoplasty.

Authors:  K Pesudovs; P Schoneveld; R J Seto; D J Coster
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Effects of vernal and allergic conjunctivitis on severity of keratoconus.

Authors:  Abdullah Kursat Cingu; Yasin Cinar; Fatih Mehmet Turkcu; Alparslan Sahin; Seyhmus Ari; Harun Yuksel; Muhammed Sahin; Ihsan Caca
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Refractive outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in fellow eyes for keratoconus.

Authors:  Emilio Pedrotti; Mattia Passilongo; Adriano Fasolo; Sara Ficial; Stefano Ferrari; Giorgio Marchini
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Histopathologic findings of keratoconus corneas underwent penetrating keratoplasty according to topographic measurements and keratoconus severity.

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Ali Jahanrad; Siavash Balali
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Is keratoconus more severe in pediatric population?

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Parviz Zarrinbakhsh; Mahgol Farjadnia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.031

6.  Effectiveness and safety of accelerated (9 mW/cm2) corneal collagen cross-linking for progressive keratoconus: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Romeela Rana-Rahman; Yunzi Chen; Dugald Bell; Jean-Pierre Danjoux; Stephen J Morgan; Saurabh Ghosh; Oliver Baylis
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Clinical Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch Crosslinking for Keratoconus Score.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Rob W P Simons; Martijn J B van der Vossen; Marc B Muijzer; Nienke Soeters; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Daniel A Godefrooij
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

8.  Intrastromal corneal ring implants for corneal thinning disorders: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

9.  Collagen cross-linking using riboflavin and ultraviolet-a for corneal thinning disorders: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  G Pron; L Ieraci; K Kaulback
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2011-11-01

10.  Nine-year follow-up of intacs implantation for keratoconus.

Authors:  George D Kymionis; Michael A Grentzelos; Vasilios F Diakonis; Aristofanis I Pallikaris; Ioannis G Pallikaris
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2009-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.