Literature DB >> 9583650

Comparison of recent trends in adolescent and adult cigarette smoking behaviour and brand preferences.

K M Cummings1, A Hyland, T F Pechacek, M Orlandi, W R Lynn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in smoking behaviour and use of cigarette brands by adults and adolescents.
DESIGN: Data analysed in this paper come from tobacco use surveys of adults and teenagers conducted in 18 communities in the United States, as part of the National Cancer Institute's Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Data on adult smoking behaviour were obtained from two cross-sectional telephone surveys, one conducted from January to May 1988 (n = 99348), and the second conducted between August 1993 and January 1994 (n = 79890). Data on adolescent smoking behaviour were obtained from two school-based surveys of ninth-grade students (aged 13-16 years), one conducted in autumn 1990 (n = 7097), and the second conducted in autumn 1992 (n = 7277). OUTCOME MEASURES: Adult cigarette smoking prevalence was estimated as the percentage of adults (18+ years) who were identified either by interview or by proxy as a current smoker. Among adolescents, current smokers were defined as those who reported having smoked on one or more of the 30 days preceding the interview. Cigarette brand use by adults was measured by asking current smokers to report the six digit UPC code on the side of the pack of their current cigarettes. A master list of UPC code numbers was developed so that reported codes could be associated with specific brand names. Among adolescents, cigarette brand use was measured by asking current smokers who reported that they usually buy their own cigarettes: "What brand do you usually buy?"
RESULTS: In ninth-grade students, smoking prevalence rates increased between 1990 and 1992 in 13 of the 18 communities. Among adults, smoking rates declined between 1988 and 1993 in 17 out of 18 communities. Within the same communities, cigarette brand use was found to be much more tightly concentrated in adolescent smokers compared with adults, with teenage smokers more likely to report using the most heavily advertised cigarette brands--Marlboro, Newport, and Camel.
CONCLUSIONS: Smoking prevalence rates have increased among teenagers, but have dropped among adults in the same communities. Among adolescents who smoke, and buy their own cigarettes, the three most heavily advertised brands--Marlboro, Camel, and Newport--have a substantially higher market concentration than among adult smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9583650      PMCID: PMC1766215          DOI: 10.1136/tc.6.suppl_2.s31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  12 in total

1.  How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93.

Authors:  G Ferris Wayne; G N Connolly
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  Tobacco marketing and adolescent smoking: more support for a causal inference.

Authors:  L Biener; M Siegel
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Adolescent smoking behaviour and cigarette brand preference in Japan.

Authors:  Y Osaki; T Tanihata; T Ohida; M Minowa; K Wada; K Suzuki; A Kaetsu; M Okamoto; T Kishimoto
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  Postmarketing surveillance for "modified-risk" tobacco products.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Racial/Ethnic and Nativity Patterns of U.S. Adolescent and Young Adult Smoking.

Authors:  Becky Wade; Joseph T Lariscy; Robert A Hummer
Journal:  Popul Res Policy Rev       Date:  2013-06-01

Review 6.  Surveillance methods for identifying, characterizing, and monitoring tobacco products: potential reduced exposure products as an example.

Authors:  Richard J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Vaughan W Rees; Gregory N Connolly; Kaila J Norton; David Sweanor; Mark Parascandola; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Pro-tobacco influences and susceptibility to smoking cigarettes among middle and high school students--United States, 2011.

Authors:  Shanta R Dube; René A Arrazola; Joann Lee; Martha Engstrom; Ann Malarcher
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.012

8.  Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions.

Authors:  Joshua Rising; Lori Alexander
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.600

9.  Epidemiology of menthol cigarette use in the United States.

Authors:  Ralph S Caraballo; Katherine Asman
Journal:  Tob Induc Dis       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 2.600

10.  Trends in market share of leading cigarette brands in the USA: national survey on drug use and health 2002-2013.

Authors:  Anushree Sharma; Brian V Fix; Cristine Delnevo; K Michael Cummings; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.