Literature DB >> 9583471

Studies in cranial suture biology: regional dura mater determines overlying suture biology.

J P Levine1, J P Bradley, D A Roth, J G McCarthy, M T Longaker.   

Abstract

The influence of dura mater on adjacent cranial sutures is significant. By better understanding the mechanisms of normal suture fusion and the role of the dura mater, it may be possible to delineate the events responsible for the premature suture fusion seen in craniosynostosis. In the Sprague-Dawley rat, the posterior frontal suture normally fuses between 12 and 20 days of postnatal life and has proved to be an excellent model to describe normal suture fusion. The purpose of this study was to document the critical role that the dura mater-suture complex may play on cranial suture biology. Forty Sprague-Dawley rats at 8 days of age were divided into two groups of 20 animals each. The control group (group A) had surgical disruption of the dura mater-calvarial interface. This was accomplished by elevating a strip of cranium inclusive of the posterior frontal and sagittal sutures and replacement of the cranial strip back to its anatomic position, all with the dura mater left intact. The experimental group (group B) had the same calvarial elevation (strip craniectomy), but the sutural anatomy/alignment was rotated 180 degrees. This rotation placed the posterior frontal suture into the sagittal suture's anatomic position and the sagittal suture into the posterior frontal suture's anatomic position. All of these procedures were accomplished by leaving the underlying dura mater intact. Animals were killed at 20, 30, 40, and 50 days (12, 22, 32, and 42 days postoperatively), and tissue sections were examined with hematoxylin and eosin staining. Group A (control) showed normal but delayed suture activity. The posterior frontal suture fused, and the sagittal suture remained patent. Fusion was delayed, not beginning before 20 days (12 days postoperative) and showing complete fusion between 30 and 40 days. Group B (180-degree calvarial rotation) demonstrated that the suture in the posterior frontal anatomic position (actual sagittal suture) fused between 20 and 40 days, whereas the suture in the sagittal anatomic position (actual posterior-frontal suture) remained patent throughout the study. This study demonstrates that the location of the dura mater-suture complex is important in determining either suture patency or closure in this model. Normal closure of the suture overlying the posterior frontal dura mater demonstrates that the dura mater itself, or forces derived in specific cranial locations, determines the overlying suture biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9583471     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199805000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  22 in total

1.  In vivo modulation of FGF biological activity alters cranial suture fate.

Authors:  J A Greenwald; B J Mehrara; J A Spector; S M Warren; P J Fagenholz; L E Smith; P J Bouletreau; F E Crisera; H Ueno; M T Longaker
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Mesodermal expression of Fgfr2S252W is necessary and sufficient to induce craniosynostosis in a mouse model of Apert syndrome.

Authors:  Greg Holmes; Claudio Basilico
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  Tissue interactions between craniosynostotic dura mater and bone.

Authors:  Gregory M Cooper; Emily L Durham; James J Cray; Michael I Siegel; Joseph E Losee; Mark P Mooney
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.046

4.  Assessing age-related ossification of the petro-occipital fissure: laying the foundation for understanding the clinicopathologies of the cranial base.

Authors:  Armand L Balboni; Thomas L Estenson; Joy S Reidenberg; Andrew D Bergemann; Jeffrey T Laitman
Journal:  Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol       Date:  2005-01

Review 5.  Developmental biology of the meninges.

Authors:  Krishnakali Dasgupta; Juhee Jeong
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 6.  The role of vertebrate models in understanding craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Greg Holmes
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  A bidirectional interface growth model for cranial interosseous suture morphogenesis.

Authors:  Christoph P E Zollikofer; John David Weissmann
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Dura mater stimulates human adipose-derived stromal cells to undergo bone formation in mouse calvarial defects.

Authors:  Benjamin Levi; Emily R Nelson; Shuli Li; Aaron W James; Jeong S Hyun; Daniel T Montoro; Min Lee; Jason P Glotzbach; George W Commons; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Midline craniofacial malformations with a lipomatous cephalocele are associated with insufficient closure of the neural tube in the tuft mouse.

Authors:  Keith S K Fong; Dana A T Adachi; Shaun B Chang; Scott Lozanoff
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2014-06-13

Review 10.  Models of cranial suture biology.

Authors:  Monica Grova; David D Lo; Daniel Montoro; Jeong S Hyun; Michael T Chung; Derrick C Wan; Michael T Longaker
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.