Literature DB >> 9581941

Feeding lactating primiparous sows to establish three divergent metabolic states: III. Milk production and pig growth.

J R Pluske1, I H Williams, L J Zak, E J Clowes, A C Cegielski, F X Aherne.   

Abstract

First-litter sows fitted with stomach cannulas were used to test the hypothesis that making gilts anabolic during lactation by providing them with extra nutrition would increase milk production and pig growth. Gilts were allocated to one of three dietary treatments after farrowing: 1) restricted, sows were fed 50% of their estimated ad libitum intake; 2) ad libitum, sows were encouraged to eat as much feed as possible; and 3) superalimented, sows were infused seven times daily through their cannula to achieve a 25 to 30% increase in energy intake in excess of that achieved by sows fed on an ad libitum basis. Milk production was estimated in mid- (d 10 to 15) and late (d 21 to 25) lactation by a modification of the isotope dilution technique. Milk production was similar between treatments in mid- and late lactation (P > .05), and this was reflected in a similarity in weaning litter weight (P = .238). Milk composition was similar also (P > .05) between dietary treatments. Superalimentation provided gilts with 38% more energy (P < .001) than gilts fed on an ad libitum basis, and they accrued live weight (5.1 kg) and backfat (1.8 mm) during lactation (P < .001). These data provide evidence that, unlike multiparous sows that show an increase in milk yield when made anabolic during lactation, primiparous sows seem to partition extra energy into body growth rather than into milk production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9581941     DOI: 10.2527/1998.7641165x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Effect of increasing dietary energy density during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, piglet vitality, and lifetime growth of offspring.

Authors:  Hazel B Rooney; Keelin O'driscoll; John V O'doherty; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Reducing BW loss during lactation in sows: a meta-analysis on the use of a nonstarch polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzyme supplement.

Authors:  Pierre Cozannet; Peadar G Lawlor; Pascal Leterme; Estelle Devillard; Pierre-Andre Geraert; Friedrich Rouffineau; Aurélie Preynat
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Poorer lifetime growth performance of gilt progeny compared with sow progeny is largely due to weight differences at birth and reduced growth in the preweaning period, and is not improved by progeny segregation after weaning.

Authors:  J R Craig; C L Collins; K L Bunter; J J Cottrell; F R Dunshea; J R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of alternative farrowing pens with temporary crating on the performance of lactating sows and their litters.

Authors:  Si Nae Cheon; So Hee Jeong; Guem Zoo Yoo; Se Jin Lim; Chan Ho Kim; Gul Won Jang; Jung Hwan Jeon
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-31

5.  Primiparous and Multiparous Sows Have Largely Similar Colostrum and Milk Composition Profiles Throughout Lactation.

Authors:  Jessica R Craig; Frank R Dunshea; Jeremy J Cottrell; Udani A Wijesiriwardana; John R Pluske
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Antagonistic maternal and direct effects of the leptin receptor gene on body weight in pigs.

Authors:  Emma Solé; Roger Ros-Freixedes; Marc Tor; Josep Reixach; Ramona N Pena; Joan Estany
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of a nursing sound stimulus on performance of lactating sows and litters.

Authors:  Jung Hwan Jeon; Doo Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2020-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.