Literature DB >> 9579836

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical benefits at no extra cost.

S M Lee1, J A Radford, L Dobson, T Huq, W D Ryder, R Pettengell, G R Morgenstern, J H Scarffe, D Crowther.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate the potential clinical and economic benefits of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) following peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) rescue after high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT), 23 consecutive patients aged less than 60 years with poor-prognosis, high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were entered into a prospective randomized trial between May 1993 and September 1995. Patients were randomized to receive either PBPC alone (n = 12) or PBPC+G-CSF (n = 11) after HDCT with busulphan and cyclophosphamide. G-CSF (300 microg day[-1]) was given from day +5 until recovery of granulocyte count to greater than 1.0 x 10(9) l(-1) for 2 consecutive days. The mean time to achieve a granulocyte count > 0.5 x 10(9) l(-1) was significantly shorter in the G-CSF arm (9.7 vs 13.2 days; P<0.0001) as was the median duration of hospital stay (12 vs 15 days; P = 0.001). In addition the recovery periods (range 9-12 vs 11-17 days to achieve a count of 1.0 x 10(9) l[-1]) and hospital stays (range 11-14 vs 13-22 days) were significantly less variable in patients receiving G-CSF in whom the values clustered around the median. There were no statistically significant differences between the study arms in terms of days of fever, documented episodes of bacteraemia, antimicrobial drug usage and platelet/red cell transfusion requirements. Taking into account the costs of total occupied-bed days, drugs, growth factor usage and haematological support, the mean expenditure per inpatient stay was pound sterling 6500 (range pound sterling 5465-pound sterling 8101) in the G-CSF group compared with pound sterling 8316 (range pound sterling 5953-pound sterling 15,801) in the group not receiving G-CSF, with an observed mean saving of 1816 per patient (or 22% of the total cost) in the G-CSF group. This study suggests that after HDCT and PBPC rescue, the use of G-CSF leads to more rapid haematological recovery periods and is associated with a more predictable and shorter hospital stay. Furthermore, and despite the additional costs for G-CSF, these clinical benefits are not translated into increased health care expenditure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9579836      PMCID: PMC2150159          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1998.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  20 in total

1.  Quantitative relationships between circulating leukocytes and infection in patients with acute leukemia.

Authors:  G P Bodey; M Buckley; Y S Sathe; E J Freireich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Low-dose filgrastim significantly enhances neutrophil recovery following autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders: evidence for clinical and economic benefit.

Authors:  I G McQuaker; A E Hunter; S Pacey; A P Haynes; A Iqbal; N H Russell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and neutrophil recovery after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  W P Sheridan; G Morstyn; M Wolf; A Dodds; J Lusk; D Maher; J E Layton; M D Green; L Souza; R M Fox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Comparative effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on priming peripheral blood progenitor cells for use with autologous bone marrow after high-dose chemotherapy.

Authors:  W P Peters; G Rosner; M Ross; J Vredenburgh; B Meisenberg; C Gilbert; J Kurtzberg
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Randomised vehicle-controlled dose-finding study of glycosylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  D C Linch; H Scarffe; S Proctor; R Chopra; P R Taylor; G Morgenstern; D Cunningham; A K Burnett; J C Cawley; I M Franklin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  A controlled trial of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after total body irradiation, high-dose chemotherapy, and autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute lymphoblastic leukemia or malignant lymphoma.

Authors:  H Link; M A Boogaerts; A M Carella; A Ferrant; H Gadner; N C Gorin; I Harabacz; J L Harousseau; P Hervé; J Holldack
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor after autologous bone marrow transplantation for lymphoid cancer.

Authors:  J Nemunaitis; S N Rabinowe; J W Singer; P J Bierman; J M Vose; A S Freedman; N Onetto; S Gillis; D Oette; M Gold
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Placebo-controlled phase III trial of lenograstim in bone-marrow transplantation.

Authors:  C Gisselbrecht; H G Prentice; A Bacigalupo; P Biron; N Milpied; H Rubie; D Cunningham; M Legros; J L Pico; D C Linch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-03-19       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Randomized study of growth factors post-peripheral-blood stem-cell transplant: neutrophil recovery is improved with modest clinical benefit.

Authors:  G Spitzer; D R Adkins; V Spencer; F R Dunphy; P J Petruska; W S Velasquez; C E Bowers; N Kronmueller; R Niemeyer; W McIntyre
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on hematopoietic recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.

Authors:  C Shimazaki; N Oku; H Uchiyama; N Yamagata; T Tatsumi; T Hirata; E Ashihara; K Okawa; H Goto; T Inaba
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.483

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: economics of high-dose therapy.

Authors:  Stephen M Beard; Lucy Wall; Louise Gaffney; Fiona Sampson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Survival disparities by insurance type for patients aged 15-64 years with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Dianne Pulte; Lina Jansen; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-15

Review 3.  Use of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in high-dose cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paolo Anderlini; Richard Champlin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Early versus late administration of pegfilgrastim after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  C Kahl; H G Sayer; A Hinke; M Freund; J Casper
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 5.  Economic evaluations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: in the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Authors:  Marc Esser; Helmut Brunner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Skoetz; Julia Bohlius; Andreas Engert; Ina Monsef; Oliver Blank; Jörg-Janne Vehreschild
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.