Literature DB >> 7512124

Randomized study of growth factors post-peripheral-blood stem-cell transplant: neutrophil recovery is improved with modest clinical benefit.

G Spitzer1, D R Adkins, V Spencer, F R Dunphy, P J Petruska, W S Velasquez, C E Bowers, N Kronmueller, R Niemeyer, W McIntyre.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical value of growth factors (GFs) with peripheral-blood stem cells (PBSC) collected following mobilization with GFs, we randomized patients to receive or not to receive GFs following transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients were apheresed after receiving the combination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) at doses of 10 micrograms/kg/d and 5 micrograms/kg/d, respectively, for 6 days before apheresis and during a median of 4 days of collections. One day after the infusion of autologous marrow and PBSC, patients were randomly assigned to receive no GFs or a combination of G-CSF (7.5 micrograms/kg/d) and GM-CSF (2.5 micrograms/kg/d), both as a 2-hour intravenous (i.v.) infusion twice per day until the neutrophil count was greater than 1,500/microL.
RESULTS: The median days to recovery to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 100/microL (9 v 11.5, P = .0005), 500/microL (10 v 16, P = .0004), or 1,000/microL (12 v 21, P = .0008) was shortened with the use of GFs, post-PBSC infusion. In addition, the duration of hospitalization was shorter (19 v 21 days, P = .0112) in the arm receiving GFs post-PBSC infusion. There was no significant difference between the two study arms in the duration of fever, documented septic episodes, or RBC or platelet transfusion requirements.
CONCLUSION: Despite faster neutrophil recovery and shortened duration of hospitalization with GFs administered after PBSC transplantation, the measured clinical variables of febrile days, septic episodes, and transfusion requirements were similar between the study arms. The use of GFs post-PBSC transfusion is associated with a modest clinical benefit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7512124     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.4.661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  12 in total

1.  At-home autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma with and without G-CSF administration: a comparative study.

Authors:  N Martínez-Cibrian; L Magnano; G Gutiérrez-García; X Andrade; J G Correa; M Suárez-Lledó; C Martínez; M Rovira; E Carreras; L Rosiñol; C F de Larrea; M T Cibeira; A Gaya; C Gallego; A Hernando; N Creus; J Bladé; Á Urbano-Ispizua; F Fernández-Avilés
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Therapeutic options in the treatment of multiple myeloma: pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations.

Authors:  F Wisløff; N Gulbrandsen; E Nord
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Clinical role of GM-CSF in neutrophil recovery in relation to health care parameters.

Authors:  L S Hofstra; E G de Vries; C A Uyl-de Groot; E Vellenga
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Plerixafor (a CXCR4 antagonist) following myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation enhances hematopoietic recovery.

Authors:  Michael M B Green; Nelson Chao; Saurabh Chhabra; Kelly Corbet; Cristina Gasparetto; Ari Horwitz; Zhiguo Li; Jagadish Kummetha Venkata; Gwynn Long; Alice Mims; David Rizzieri; Stefanie Sarantopoulos; Robert Stuart; Anthony D Sung; Keith M Sullivan; Luciano Costa; Mitchell Horwitz; Yubin Kang
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 5.  Hematopoietic growth factors and treatment of testicular cancer: biological interactions, routine use and dose-intensive chemotherapy.

Authors:  C Bokemeyer; M A Kuczyk; H Köhne; H Einsele; B Kynast; H J Schmoll
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 6.  Prophylactic antibiotics or G(M)-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nicole Skoetz; Julia Bohlius; Andreas Engert; Ina Monsef; Oliver Blank; Jörg-Janne Vehreschild
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-21

7.  High-dose carboplatin, etoposide and melphalan (CEM) with peripheral blood progenitor cell support as late intensification for high-risk cancer: non-haematological, haematological toxicities and role of growth factor administration.

Authors:  P Benedetti Panici; L Pierelli; G Scambia; M L Foddai; M G Salerno; G Menichella; M Vittori; F Maneschi; U Caracussi; R Serafini; G Leone; S Mancuso
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) following high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell rescue in high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: clinical benefits at no extra cost.

Authors:  S M Lee; J A Radford; L Dobson; T Huq; W D Ryder; R Pettengell; G R Morgenstern; J H Scarffe; D Crowther
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  High-dose carboplatin, thiotepa and cyclophosphamide (CTC) with peripheral blood stem cell support in the adjuvant therapy of high-risk breast cancer: a practical approach.

Authors:  E van der Wall; W J Nooijen; J W Baars; M J Holtkamp; J H Schorangel; D J Richel; E J Rutgers; I C Slaper-Cortenbach; C E van der Schoot; S Rodenhuis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Efficacy of deferred dosing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in autologous hematopoietic transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  J E Cox; S Campos; J Wu; R May; H Liu; C A Ramos; G Carrum; H E Heslop; M K Brenner; R T Kamble
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.483

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.