Literature DB >> 9577486

Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography.

S Wildermuth1, M Zanetti, S Duewell, M R Schmid, B Romanowski, A Benini, T Böni, J Hodler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare measurements of the sagittal diameter of the lumbar dural sac obtained at positional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and at functional myelography and to assess the influence of various body positions on the dural sac and the intervertebral foramina.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients referred for lumbar myelography were examined with an open 0.5-T MR imager, Sagittal T2-weighted fast spin-echo images were acquired with patients in the supine, upright flexion, and upright extension positions. The midsagittal diameter of the dural sac was measured at the level of the disks on MR images and myelograms. Foraminal sizes on the MR images were scored independently by two observers.
RESULTS: Correlation between MR imaging and myelographic measurements was high (r = .81-.97). A small but statistically significant positional dependence of the dural sac diameter was found in the lower lumbar spine. Position-dependent differences in foraminal scores were uncommon.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative assessment of sagittal dural sac diameters is comparable between lumbar myelography and positional MR imaging. In a selected patient population, only small changes in the sagittal diameter of the dural sac and foraminal size can be expected between various body positions, and the information gained in addition to that from standard MR imaging is limited [corrected].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9577486     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  63 in total

1.  Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; M-H Rho; H-P Hong; H-J Kwag; S-H Kook; S-H Choi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Evaluation of lumber nerve root compression using thin-slice thickness coronal magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional fat-suppressed multi-shot balanced non-steady-state free precession versus three-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient-recalled echo.

Authors:  Keizo Tanitame; Nobuko Tanitame; Chihiro Tani; Masaki Ishikawa; Miyuki Takasu; Shuji Date; Keiko Otani; Kazuo Awai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Upright, weight-bearing, dynamic-kinetic MRI of the spine: initial results.

Authors:  J Randy Jinkins; Jay S Dworkin; Raymond V Damadian
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Marc A Brockmann; André Kemmling; Christoph Groden
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability: what is it and how does imaging contribute?

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Study of the effects of flexion on the position of the conus medullaris.

Authors:  David F Bauer; Mohammadali M Shoja; Marios Loukas; W Jerry Oakes; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yvonne Yan On Lau; Ryan Ka Lok Lee; James Francis Griffith; Carol Lai Yee Chan; Sheung Wai Law; Kin On Kwok
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Ultrasound-guided transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a new guidance method that reduces radiation doses.

Authors:  Mingbo Zhang; Longtao Yan; Shoupeng Li; Yingying Li; Peng Huang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Systematic review of radiological cervical foraminal grading systems.

Authors:  James Meacock; Moritz Schramm; Senthil Selvanathan; Stuart Currie; Deborah Stocken; David Jayne; Simon Thomson
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; E-C Chung; M-H Rho; H-J Kwon; S-H Kook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.