Literature DB >> 9576823

Syntactic facilitation in agrammatic sentence production.

R J Hartsuiker1, H H Kolk.   

Abstract

Recently, proposals have been made to relate processing difficulties in aphasic language performance to limitations in resources for grammatical processing (Carpenter et al., 1994; Hagiwara, 1995; Kolk, 1995; Martin & Romani, 1994). Such proposals may account for a defining characteristic of agrammatic sentence production: reduced syntactic complexity. Syntactic structures that require deep hierarchical processing or reversals of canonical word order make demands exceeding limited resources. In the present study, we investigate the possibility of counteracting hypothesized resource limitations by increasing the availability of relatively complex sentences (i.e., datives and passives). The phenomenon of "syntactic priming" has been observed in a number of studies with healthy adults (e.g., Bock, 1986). With respect to Broca's aphasia, we hypothesized that increased availability of a syntactic structure, due to syntactic priming, results in a lesser demand on (limited) resources for sentence production. We elicited speech from 12 Broca's aphasics and 12 control subjects in three different conditions: spontaneous speech, picture description without priming, and picture description with priming. In addition, we varied instructions, in order to determine the role of strategies. The main findings were that (a) Brocas show stronger syntactic priming effects than controls; (b) the effects are automatic rather than strategic; and (c) in conditions with priming, Brocas produce relatively complex sentences (e.g., passives). We discuss these results in relation to capacity theories. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576823     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1997.1905

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  25 in total

1.  Effect of lexical cues on the production of active and passive sentences in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia.

Authors:  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Effects of weight and syntactic priming on the production of cantonese verb-doubling.

Authors:  Elaine J Francis; Stephen Matthews; Reace Wing Yan Wong; Stella Wing Man Kwan
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2011-02

3.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Kerry Ledoux; Matthew J Traxler; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-02

5.  Verb inflections in agrammatic aphasia: Encoding of tense features.

Authors:  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 6.  Structural priming: a critical review.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Conceptual structure modulates structural priming in the production of complex sentences.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin; Justin Weinstein-Tull
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Effects of Verb Overlap on Structural Priming in Dialogue: Implications for Syntactic Learning in Aphasia.

Authors:  Grace Man; Sarah Meehan; Nadine Martin; Holly Branigan; Jiyeon Lee
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Grammatical Encoding and Learning in Agrammatic Aphasia: Evidence from Structural Priming.

Authors:  Soojin Cho-Reyes; Jennifer E Mack; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Aligning sentence structures in dialogue: evidence from aphasia.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Grace Man; Victor Ferreira; Nicholas Gruberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.