Literature DB >> 9576111

Virtual electrode-induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure.

I R Efimov1, Y Cheng, D R Van Wagoner, T Mazgalev, P J Tchou.   

Abstract

Delivery of a strong electric shock to the heart remains the only effective therapy against ventricular fibrillation. Despite significant improvements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy, the fundamental mechanisms of defibrillation remain poorly understood. We have recently demonstrated that a monophasic defibrillation shock produces a highly nonuniform epicardial polarization pattern, referred to as a virtual electrode pattern (VEP). The VEP consists of large adjacent areas of strong positive and negative polarization. We sought to determine whether the VEP may be responsible for defibrillation failure by creating dispersion of postshock repolarization and reentry. Truncated exponential biphasic and monophasic shocks were delivered from a bipolar ICD lead in Langendorff-perfused rabbit hearts. Epicardial electrical activity was mapped during and after defibrillation shocks and shocks applied at the plateau phase of a normal action potential produced by ventricular pacing. A high-resolution fluorescence mapping system with 256 recording sites and a voltage-sensitive dye were used. Biphasic shocks with a weak second phase (<20% leading-edge voltage of the second phase with respect to the leading-edge voltage of the first phase) produced VEPs similar to monophasic shocks. Biphasic shocks with a strong second phase (>70%) produced VEPs of reversed polarity. Both of these waveforms resulted in extra beats and arrhythmias. However, biphasic waveforms with intermediate second-phase voltages (20% to 70% of first-phase voltage) produced no VEP, because of an asymmetric reversal of the first-phase polarization. Therefore, there was no substrate for postshock dispersion of repolarization. Shocks producing strong VEPs resulted in postshock reentrant arrhythmias via a mechanism of phase singularity. Points of phase singularity were created by the shock in the intersection of areas of positive, negative, and no polarization, which were set by the shock to excited, excitable, and refractory states, respectively. Shock-induced VEPs may reinduce arrhythmias via a phase-singularity mechanism. Strong shocks may overcome the preshock electrical activity and create phase singularities, regardless of the preshock phase distribution. Optimal defibrillation waveforms did not produce VEPs because of an asymmetric effect of phase reversal on membrane polarization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9576111     DOI: 10.1161/01.res.82.8.918

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Res        ISSN: 0009-7330            Impact factor:   17.367


  54 in total

1.  Modelling induction of a rotor in cardiac muscle by perpendicular electric shocks.

Authors:  K Skouibine; J Wall; W Krassowska; N Trayanova
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Intramural multisite recording of transmembrane potential in the heart.

Authors:  D A Hooks; I J LeGrice; J D Harvey; B H Smaill
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Mechanisms of defibrillation.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Vladimir G Fast; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Asymmetry in membrane responses to electric shocks: insights from bidomain simulations.

Authors:  Takashi Ashihara; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Functional scaffold-free 3-D cardiac microtissues: a novel model for the investigation of heart cells.

Authors:  B R Desroches; P Zhang; B-R Choi; M E King; A E Maldonado; W Li; A Rago; G Liu; N Nath; K M Hartmann; B Yang; G Koren; J R Morgan; U Mende
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.733

6.  Regional cooling facilitates termination of spiral-wave reentry through unpinning of rotors in rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Masatoshi Yamazaki; Haruo Honjo; Takashi Ashihara; Masahide Harada; Ichiro Sakuma; Kazuo Nakazawa; Natalia Trayanova; Minoru Horie; Jérôme Kalifa; José Jalife; Kaichiro Kamiya; Itsuo Kodama
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez; Li Li; James C Eason; Igor R Efimov; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Cardiac defibrillation and the role of mechanoelectric feedback in postshock arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Viatcheslav Gurev; Mary M Maleckar; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Drawing the curtain on the isoelectric window?

Authors:  Natalia Trayanova
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Chronaxie of defibrillation: a pathway toward further optimization of defibrillation waveform?

Authors:  Igor R Efimov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.