OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the ability of quantitative digital subtraction radiography to detect small changes in bone thickness adjacent to tooth roots. STUDY DESIGN: A series of cortical or cancellous bone slices with a 50 microm-stepwise increasing thickness were attached to 4 porcine mandible sections covering buccal and interproximal "defect" regions. Standardized radiographs were quantitatively evaluated for radiographic density changes with the use of digital subtraction radiography. Furthermore, all radiographs were conventionally evaluated by 10 clinicians. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: A high linear correlation was found between the actual thickness of bone slices and radiographic density changes (cortical bone: r2 = 0.89 to 0.99; cancellous bone r2 = 0.61 to 0.86, p < or = 0.001). A certain increase in bone thickness caused a 3 times higher increase in radiographic density for cortical bone than for cancellous bone (p < or = 0.05). The detection limits of digital subtraction radiography were 200 microm for cortical and 500 microm for cancellous bone, whereas the detection limits of conventional radiography were 600 microm and 2850 microm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study demonstrated a very high correlation between the objective, quantitative assessment of subtle changes in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography and the true changes in bone thickness.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the ability of quantitative digital subtraction radiography to detect small changes in bone thickness adjacent to tooth roots. STUDY DESIGN: A series of cortical or cancellous bone slices with a 50 microm-stepwise increasing thickness were attached to 4 porcine mandible sections covering buccal and interproximal "defect" regions. Standardized radiographs were quantitatively evaluated for radiographic density changes with the use of digital subtraction radiography. Furthermore, all radiographs were conventionally evaluated by 10 clinicians. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: A high linear correlation was found between the actual thickness of bone slices and radiographic density changes (cortical bone: r2 = 0.89 to 0.99; cancellous bone r2 = 0.61 to 0.86, p < or = 0.001). A certain increase in bone thickness caused a 3 times higher increase in radiographic density for cortical bone than for cancellous bone (p < or = 0.05). The detection limits of digital subtraction radiography were 200 microm for cortical and 500 microm for cancellous bone, whereas the detection limits of conventional radiography were 600 microm and 2850 microm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This in vitro study demonstrated a very high correlation between the objective, quantitative assessment of subtle changes in alveolar bone by digital subtraction radiography and the true changes in bone thickness.
Authors: R S de Molon; R G Batitucci; R Spin-Neto; G M Paquier; C E Sakakura; G M Tosoni; G Scaf Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 2.419