Literature DB >> 9574700

Evaluation of Murex CMV DNA hybrid capture assay for detection and quantitation of cytomegalovirus infection in patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

H Hebart1, D Gamer, J Loeffler, C Mueller, C Sinzger, G Jahn, P Bader, T Klingebiel, L Kanz, H Einsele.   

Abstract

Murex hybrid capture DNA assay (HCS) is a solution hybridization antibody capture assay for detection and quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA in leukocytes. To determine whether CMV HCS is sensitive enough to initiate and monitor antiviral therapy after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), 51 consecutive SCT recipients were prospectively screened for the appearance of CMV infection by HCS, PCR, and culture assays from blood samples. Preemptive antiviral therapy was initiated after the second positive PCR result in all patients, as previously reported, and HCS was not considered for clinical decision making. A total of 417 samples were analyzed. Of these, 21 samples were found to be positive by PCR and HCS, 88 samples were PCR positive but HCS negative, and 308 were negative by both assays. Concordance of results between PCR and HCS and between HCS and blood culture was observed in 78.9 and 95.9% of the samples assayed, respectively. PCR was found to be more sensitive than HCS, and HCS was more sensitive than the blood culture assay (P < 0.0001). Four patients with symptomatic CMV infection were PCR positive prior to the onset of CMV-related symptoms, whereas HCS detected CMV DNA in three patients prior to and one at onset of CMV disease. The numbers of genomes per milliliter of blood were higher in patients with symptomatic CMV infection than in those with asymptomatic CMV infection (P = 0.06). None of the HCS-negative patients developed CMV disease. Thus, all patients with CMV disease were correctly identified by HCS; however, the lower sensitivity limit of the HCS assay may still be insufficient to allow diagnosis of CMV infection early enough to prevent CMV disease in patients following allogeneic SCT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9574700      PMCID: PMC104823          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.36.5.1333-1337.1998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  19 in total

1.  Polymerase chain reaction to evaluate antiviral therapy for cytomegalovirus disease.

Authors:  H Einsele; G Ehninger; M Steidle; A Vallbracht; M Müller; H Schmidt; J G Saal; H D Waller; C A Müller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-09       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of a new quantitative cytomegalovirus DNA assay with other detection methods.

Authors:  M Macartney; E J Gane; B Portmann; R Williams
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Factors influencing detection of quantitative cytomegalovirus antigenemia.

Authors:  M Boeckh; P M Woogerd; T Stevens-Ayers; C G Ray; R A Bowden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection after human marrow transplantation.

Authors:  J D Meyers; N Flournoy; E D Thomas
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Treatment of cytomegalovirus pneumonia with ganciclovir and intravenous cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin in patients with bone marrow transplants.

Authors:  E C Reed; R A Bowden; P S Dandliker; K E Lilleby; J D Meyers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Early occurrence of human cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation as demonstrated by the polymerase chain reaction technique.

Authors:  H Einsele; M Steidle; A Vallbracht; J G Saal; G Ehninger; C A Müller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  High levels of circulating cytomegalovirus DNA reflect visceral organ disease in viremic immunosuppressed patients other than marrow recipients.

Authors:  R L Saltzman; M R Quirk; M C Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Early diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus disease in transplant recipients by DNA amplification in plasma.

Authors:  D G Wolf; S A Spector
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes of immunocompromised patients by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  D Zipeto; F Baldanti; D Zella; M Furione; A Cavicchini; G Milanesi; G Gerna
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.014

10.  Polymerase chain reaction monitoring reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease and the duration and side effects of antiviral therapy after bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  H Einsele; G Ehninger; H Hebart; K M Wittkowski; U Schuler; G Jahn; P Mackes; M Herter; T Klingebiel; J Löffler; S Wagner; C A Müller
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  8 in total

1.  Nucleotide sequence-based multitarget identification.

Authors:  T Vinayagamoorthy; Kirk Mulatz; Roger Hodkinson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Qualitative plasma PCR assay (AMPLICOR CMV test) versus pp65 antigenemia assay for monitoring cytomegalovirus viremia and guiding preemptive ganciclovir therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  C Solano; I Muñoz; A Gutiérrez; A Farga; F Prósper; J García-Conde; D Navarro; C Gimeno
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Quantification of human cytomegalovirus DNA in bone marrow transplant recipients by real-time PCR.

Authors:  F Griscelli; M Barrois; S Chauvin; S Lastere; D Bellet; J H Bourhis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Multicenter comparison of the digene hybrid capture CMV DNA assay (version 2.0), the pp65 antigenemia assay, and cell culture for detection of cytomegalovirus viremia.

Authors:  T Mazzulli; L W Drew; B Yen-Lieberman; D Jekic-McMullen; D J Kohn; C Isada; G Moussa; R Chua; S Walmsley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Greet J Boland; Leo F Verdonck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Evaluation of the murex hybrid capture cytomegalovirus DNA assay versus plasma PCR and shell vial assay for diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus viremia in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  W Y Barrett-Muir; C Aitken; K Templeton; M Raftery; S M Kelsey; J Breuer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation in bone marrow transplant recipients by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Seyed H Ghaffari; Narghes Obeidi; Mehdi Dehghan; Kamran Alimoghaddam; Ahmad Gharehbaghian; Ardashir Ghavamzadeh
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.201

8.  Very Early Cytomegalovirus Infection After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center 20-Year Perspective.

Authors:  M R Jorgenson; J L Descourouez; B C Astor; J A Smith; F Aziz; R R Redfield; D A Mandelbrot
Journal:  Virology (Auckl)       Date:  2019-04-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.