Literature DB >> 9210508

Comparison of a new quantitative cytomegalovirus DNA assay with other detection methods.

M Macartney1, E J Gane, B Portmann, R Williams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed a new cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA hybridization assay. We also compared the assay with other currently used assays to determine its use in the early detection of active CMV infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sequential whole blood samples collected from 109 patients who had undergone orthotopic liver transplantation were tested using the Murex hybrid capture system, cell culture, antigen detection, and serology. Liver biopsies performed during the study period for graft dysfunction in 84 patients were examined for histological features of CMV hepatitis. The biopsies were also immunostained for the presence of CMV antigens.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients developed clinically significant CMV disease (CMV syndrome in six patients and CMV hepatitis in nine patients, including two patients with disseminated CMV disease). In all 15, CMV DNA was detected by the hybrid capture assay between 1 and 20 days before other CMV assays. Fourteen of the 15 patients had CMV DNA levels greater than 50 pg/ml; the other patient had a value of 48 pg/ml. Of the remaining 94 patients with no evidence of CMV disease, 86 were negative by the hybrid capture assay and 8 were positive; all but one patient had values less than 50 pg/ml. DNA levels fell rapidly in all patients during antiviral therapy.
CONCLUSION: Unlike conventional CMV detection methods, this hybridization assay is an early predictor of clinically significant CMV infection after liver transplantation and also provides quantitation of viral load, allowing monitoring of antiviral therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9210508     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199706270-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  8 in total

1.  Use of molecular assays in diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus disease following renal transplantation.

Authors:  C Aitken; W Barrett-Muir; C Millar; K Templeton; J Thomas; F Sheridan; D Jeffries; M Yaqoob; J Breuer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid-organ or stem-cell transplantation. Current guidelines and future prospects.

Authors:  H Hebart; L Kanz; G Jahn; H Einsele
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  New strategies for prevention and therapy of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  I G Sia; R Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evaluation of Murex CMV DNA hybrid capture assay for detection and quantitation of cytomegalovirus infection in patients following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  H Hebart; D Gamer; J Loeffler; C Mueller; C Sinzger; G Jahn; P Bader; T Klingebiel; L Kanz; H Einsele
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Multicenter comparison of the digene hybrid capture CMV DNA assay (version 2.0), the pp65 antigenemia assay, and cell culture for detection of cytomegalovirus viremia.

Authors:  T Mazzulli; L W Drew; B Yen-Lieberman; D Jekic-McMullen; D J Kohn; C Isada; G Moussa; R Chua; S Walmsley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Clinical utility of viral load in management of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Raymund R Razonable; Randall T Hayden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 7.  Quantitation of cytomegalovirus: methodologic aspects and clinical applications.

Authors:  M Boeckh; G Boivin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  CMV infection of liver transplant recipients: comparison of antigenemia and molecular biology assays.

Authors:  M L Amorim; J M Cabeda; R Seca; A C Mendes; A P Castro; J M Amorim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.