C H Tator1. 1. Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Hospital and University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the anatomic and pathophysiological bases for recovery of neurological function after experimental or clinical spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Current knowledge regarding the recovery of neurological function after experimental or clinical SCI was reviewed to determine the biological basis of neurological recovery. RESULTS: There is a great propensity for recovery after clinical or experimental SCI. An examination of the anatomic basis of recovery indicates that there is a potential for both root and cord recovery, with the latter involving recovery of both gray and white matter of the cord. Resolution of acute injury events, such as hemorrhaging, and resolution of secondary pathophysiological processes, such as ischemia and excitotoxicity, can each account for recovery. The third recovery mechanism involves regrowth or regeneration of nervous tissue, resulting from either inherent or induced processes. CONCLUSION: During the Decade of the Brain, there has been a profusion of very promising in vitro and in vivo studies that have shown enhanced neurological recovery after experimental or clinical SCI.
OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the anatomic and pathophysiological bases for recovery of neurological function after experimental or clinical spinal cord injury (SCI). METHODS: Current knowledge regarding the recovery of neurological function after experimental or clinical SCI was reviewed to determine the biological basis of neurological recovery. RESULTS: There is a great propensity for recovery after clinical or experimental SCI. An examination of the anatomic basis of recovery indicates that there is a potential for both root and cord recovery, with the latter involving recovery of both gray and white matter of the cord. Resolution of acute injury events, such as hemorrhaging, and resolution of secondary pathophysiological processes, such as ischemia and excitotoxicity, can each account for recovery. The third recovery mechanism involves regrowth or regeneration of nervous tissue, resulting from either inherent or induced processes. CONCLUSION: During the Decade of the Brain, there has been a profusion of very promising in vitro and in vivo studies that have shown enhanced neurological recovery after experimental or clinical SCI.
Authors: Jessica L Nielson; Cristian F Guandique; Aiwen W Liu; Darlene A Burke; A Todd Lash; Rod Moseanko; Stephanie Hawbecker; Sarah C Strand; Sharon Zdunowski; Karen-Amanda Irvine; John H Brock; Yvette S Nout-Lomas; John C Gensel; Kim D Anderson; Mark R Segal; Ephron S Rosenzweig; David S K Magnuson; Scott R Whittemore; Dana M McTigue; Phillip G Popovich; Alexander G Rabchevsky; Stephen W Scheff; Oswald Steward; Grégoire Courtine; V Reggie Edgerton; Mark H Tuszynski; Michael S Beattie; Jacqueline C Bresnahan; Adam R Ferguson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Martin M Mortazavi; Ketan Verma; Aman Deep; Fatemeh B Esfahani; Patrick R Pritchard; R Shane Tubbs; Nicholas Theodore Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2010-12-18 Impact factor: 1.475