Literature DB >> 9571525

Health care costs of worksite health promotion participants and non-participants.

R Z Goetzel1, B H Jacobson, S G Aldana, K Vardell, L Yee.   

Abstract

Total and lifestyle-related medical care costs for employees of a major corporation participating in a worksite health promotion (WHP) program over a three-year period were compared with the costs for non-participants in a cross-sectional study. The study population consisted of 8,334 active employees based in the Cincinnati headquarters of The Procter & Gamble Company. Adjusting for age and gender, participants (n = 3,993) had significantly lower health care costs (29% lower total and 36% lower lifestyle-related costs) when compared with non-participants (n = 4,341) in the third year of the program. Similarly, in the third year of the program, participants had significantly lower inpatient costs, fewer hospital admissions, and fewer hospital days of care when compared with non-participants. No significant differences in costs were found between participants and non-participants during the first two years of the WHP program. Conclusions drawn from this study are that long-term participation in a WHP that includes high-risk screening and intensive one-on-one counseling results in lower total and lifestyle-related health care costs, as well as lower utilization of hospital services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9571525     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-199804000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1076-2752            Impact factor:   2.162


  15 in total

1.  Health promotion in the workplace: framing the concept; reviewing the evidence.

Authors:  M Shain; D M Kramer
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Workplace health promotion and utilization of health services: follow-up data findings.

Authors:  Diane Deitz; Royer Cook; Rebekah Hersch
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  The Art of Health Promotion: Linking research to practice. New Measures for New Directions

Authors:  Jessica Grossmeier
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-09

4.  Impact of a soft tip nicotine-free harmless cigarette as part of a smoking cessation program with psychological support and varenicline: an integrated workplace smoking cessation intervention.

Authors:  Marilena Maglia; Pasquale Caponnetto; Riccardo Polosa; Cristina Russo; Giuseppe Santisi
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-11

5.  Economic evaluation of a worksite obesity prevention and intervention trial among hotel workers in Hawaii.

Authors:  Richard T Meenan; Thomas M Vogt; Andrew E Williams; Victor J Stevens; Cheryl L Albright; Claudio Nigg
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.162

6.  A Simple Method to Estimate the Impact of a Workplace Wellness Program on Absenteeism Cost.

Authors:  Kristina M Rabarison; Jason E Lang; Connie L Bish; Melissa Bird; Mehran S Massoudi
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-08-21

7.  The Effects of Two Workplace Weight Management Programs and Weight Loss on Health Care Utilization and Costs.

Authors:  Truls Østbye; Marissa Stroo; Eric L Eisenstein; John M Dement
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 8.  A Scoping Review of Economic Evaluations of Workplace Wellness Programs.

Authors:  Nilay Unsal; GracieLee Weaver; Jeremy Bray; Daniel Bibeau
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Readiness of US health plans to manage cardiometabolic risk.

Authors:  Thomas E Kottke; Courtney O Jordan; Patrick J O'Connor; Nicolaas P Pronk; Rita Carreón
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Development of a community-wide cardiovascular risk reduction assessment tool for small rural employers in upstate New York.

Authors:  Ron Z Goetzel; Rivka C Liss-Levinson; Nanette Goodman; James X Kennedy
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.