Literature DB >> 9570583

Aided speech recognition abilities of adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss.

M C Flynn1, R C Dowell, G M Clark.   

Abstract

Adults with severe or severe-to-profound hearing losses constitute between 11% and 13.5% of the hearing-impaired population. A detailed investigation of the speech recognition of adults with severe (n = 20) or severe-to-profound (n = 14) hearing loss was conducted at The University of Melbourne. Each participant took part in a series of speech recognition tasks while wearing his or her currently fitted hearing aid(s). The assessments included closed-set tests of consonant recognition and vowel recognition, combined with open-set tests of monosyllabic word recognition and sentence recognition. Sentences were presented in quiet and in noise at +10 dB SNR to replicate an environment more typical of everyday listening conditions. Although the results demonstrated wide variability in performance, some general trends were observed. As expected vowels were generally well perceived compared with consonants. Monosyllabic word recognition scores for both the adults with a severe hearing impairment (M = 67.2%) and the adults with a severe-to-profound hearing impairment (M = 38.6%) could be predicted from the segmental tests, with an allowance for lexical effects. Scores for sentences presented in quiet showed additional linguistic effects and a significant decrease in performance with the addition of background noise (from 82.9% to 74.1% for adults with a severe hearing loss and from 55.8% to 34.2% for adults with a severe-to-profound hearing loss). Comparisons were made between the participants and a group of adults using a multiple-channel cochlear implant. This comparison indicated that some adults with a severe or severe-to-profound hearing loss may benefit from the use of a cochlear implant. The results of this study support the contention that cochlear implant candidacy should not rely solely on audiometric thresholds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9570583     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4102.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  7 in total

Review 1.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The Characteristics of Adults with Severe Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover; Michael Blackburn; Frederick Gallun
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  An evaluation framework for research platforms to advance cochlear implant/hearing aid technology: A case study with CCi-MOBILE.

Authors:  Ram C M C Shekar; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Aided and unaided speech perception by older hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  David L Woods; Tanya Arbogast; Zoe Doss; Masood Younus; Timothy J Herron; E William Yund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preliminary Evaluation of Automated Speech Recognition Apps for the Hearing Impaired and Deaf.

Authors:  Leontien Pragt; Peter van Hengel; Dagmar Grob; Jan-Willem A Wasmann
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-02-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.