Literature DB >> 9570483

Economic comparisons of the pharmacotherapy of depression: an overview.

R Crott1, P Gilis.   

Abstract

As many countries find that their health care expenditure is taking up an increasing proportion of their financial resources, economic aspects of care processes have become more important in the choice of optimal strategies. This review of the economic studies of the comparative treatment of depression shows that nearly every aspect of treatment has important economic consequences. Cost-of-illness studies have documented the high burden on society of this disorder, and the associated loss of productivity and work. Comparative cost-effectiveness/utility studies, the majority of which are based on modelling techniques, have consistently shown a better cost-effectiveness ratio of the newer antidepressants over more traditional tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), when all therapy-related costs are taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9570483     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb09995.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand        ISSN: 0001-690X            Impact factor:   6.392


  6 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: drug treatment of depression.

Authors:  O Spigset; B Mårtensson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-01

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antidepressants : a critical appraisal of methods.

Authors:  Sheikh Usman Iqbal; Mark Prashker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Medicine Cabinet: Drug treatment of depression.

Authors:  B Martensson; O Spigset
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1999-08

4.  Long term pharmacotherapy of depression. Tricyclic antidepressants should not be first line treatment.

Authors:  D Gamble; J Thakore
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-24

Review 5.  The need for an iterative process for assessing economic outcomes associated with SSRIs.

Authors:  T L Skaer; D A Sclar; L M Robison; R S Galin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.