Literature DB >> 11147388

The need for an iterative process for assessing economic outcomes associated with SSRIs.

T L Skaer1, D A Sclar, L M Robison, R S Galin.   

Abstract

Pharmacotherapeutic advances in the treatment of depression have included the development of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), thereby providing alternatives to tricyclic antidepressants. Concurrent with these events have been significant structural (e.g. pharmaceutical formularies) and regulatory (e.g. required pharmacoeconomic evaluations) changes in the delivery, financing, and oversight of healthcare programmes throughout the world. International cost-containment initiatives are increasingly mandating a demonstration of value for money, defined in terms of a measurable health and/or financial outcome, and, in the case of medicines, attributable to a given expenditure, for a given pharmacotherapeutic option. We examine the inherent strengths and weaknesses of 5 study designs used to discern and contrast financial outcomes stemming from the use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for the treatment of depressive illness [randomised controlled trials (RCTs); meta-analyses; decision-analytical models (DAMs); retrospective database investigations; randomised naturalistic inquiry]. We argue that the economic appraisal of pharmacotherapy requires an iterative process extending from the developmental (RCTs; meta-analyses; DAMs) through to the postmarketing phase (database reviews; naturalistic inquiry), thereby resulting in a portfolio of evidence as to the safety, efficacy and effectiveness of a given pharmacotherapeutic category (e.g. SSRIs) and/or a specific medication. Database reviews, while nonrandomised, and prospective naturalistic inquiry afford greater insight into the patterns of use and financial merits of prescribing specific pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of depression within the context of clinical practice as compared with RCTs, meta-analyses and DAMs. The portfolio of evidence to date indicates that the first-line use of SSRIs in the treatment of depression is clinically warranted, and represents value for money.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11147388     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200018030-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  135 in total

1.  Methodological and conduct principles for pharmacoeconomic research. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Authors:  K Clemens; R Townsend; F Luscombe; J Mauskopf; J Osterhaus; J Bobula
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Health economic evaluations of antidepressants: a review.

Authors:  T R Hylan; D P Buesching; G D Tollefson
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.505

Review 3.  Choosing an antidepressant: effectiveness based pharmacoeconomics.

Authors:  A Stewart
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.839

4.  Treatment discontinuation with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors compared with tricyclic antidepressants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  I M Anderson; B M Tomenson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

5.  Harvesting knowledge from improvement.

Authors:  D M Berwick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Recent progress in the epidemiology of major depression.

Authors:  P W Burvill
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 6.222

7.  Trends in the prescription of antidepressants by office-based psychiatrists.

Authors:  M Olfson; G L Klerman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  F Song; N Freemantle; T A Sheldon; A House; P Watson; A Long; J Mason
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-13

9.  The undertreatment of depression.

Authors:  T S Brugha; P E Bebbington
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 10.  Comparative tolerability profiles of the newer versus older antidepressants.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; H K Manji; W Z Potter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.606

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of antidepressants : a critical appraisal of methods.

Authors:  Sheikh Usman Iqbal; Mark Prashker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Diagnosis of depression and use of antidepressant pharmacotherapy among adults in the United States: does a disparity persist by ethnicity/race?

Authors:  David A Sclar; Linda M Robison; Jennifer M Schmidt; Kurt A Bowen; Leigh V Castillo; Ambartsum M Oganov
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.859

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.