Literature DB >> 9566703

Inhibitory effect of selenomethionine on the growth of three selected human tumor cell lines.

C Redman1, J A Scott, A T Baines, J L Basye, L C Clark, C Calley, D Roe, C M Payne, M A Nelson.   

Abstract

Selenium supplementation has been shown for many years to work as an anticarcinogenic agent both in epidemiology and in in vitro studies. Selenium supplementation has recently been shown to decrease total cancer incidence. However, the mechanism of action of selenium as an anticarcinogenic agent has yet to be elucidated. Selenomethionine was the predominant form of selenium in the dietary supplement in the study by Clark et al. (Clark, L.C., Combs, G.F., Turnbull, W.B., Slate, E.H., Chalker, D.K., Chow, J., Davis, L.S., Glover, R.A., Graham, G.F., Gross, E.G., Krongrad, A., Lesher, J.L., Park, H.K., Sanders, B.B., Smith, C.L., Taylor, J.R. and The Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group (1996) Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 276 (24), 1957-1963) and therefore we evaluated the growth inhibitory effects of selenomethionine against human tumor cells. Selenomethionine was tested against each of three human tumor cell lines (MCF-7/S breast carcinoma, DU-145 prostate cancer cells and UACC-375 melanoma) and against normal human diploid fibroblasts. All cell lines demonstrated a dose-dependent manner of growth inhibition by selenomethionine. Selenomethionine inhibited the growth of all of the human tumor cell lines in the micromolar (microM) range (ranging from 45 to 130 microM) while growth inhibition of normal diploid fibroblasts required 1 mM selenomethionine, approximately 1000-fold higher than for the cancer cell lines. In short, normal diploid fibroblasts were less sensitive than the cancer cell lines to the growth inhibitory effects of selenomethionine. Furthermore, we show that selenomethionine administration to these cancer cell lines results in apoptotic cell death and aberrant mitoses. These results demonstrate the differential sensitivity of tumor cells and normal cells to selenomethionine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9566703     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3835(97)00497-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Lett        ISSN: 0304-3835            Impact factor:   8.679


  32 in total

Review 1.  Lifestyle and dietary factors in the prevention of lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn M Wilson; Edward L Giovannucci; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The potential for prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 3.  Selenium at the redox interface of the genome, metabolome and exposome.

Authors:  Jolyn Fernandes; Xin Hu; M Ryan Smith; Young-Mi Go; Dean P Jones
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 7.376

4.  Imbalance in Protein Thiol Redox Regulation and Cancer-Preventive Efficacy of Selenium.

Authors:  Rayudu Gopalakrishna; Usha Gundimeda; Sarah Zhou; Kristen Zung; Kaitlyn Forell; Arne Holmgren
Journal:  React Oxyg Species (Apex)       Date:  2016-05-25

5.  Oxidative metabolism of seleno-L-methionine to L-methionine selenoxide by flavin-containing monooxygenases.

Authors:  Renee J Krause; Steven C Glocke; Anna Rita Sicuri; Sharon L Ripp; Adnan A Elfarra
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  Responses of an American eel brain endothelial-like cell line to selenium deprivation and to selenite, selenate, and selenomethionine additions in different exposure media.

Authors:  Sophia R Bloch; John J Kim; Phuc H Pham; Peter V Hodson; Lucy E J Lee; Niels C Bols
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Dose-dependent effects of selenized yeast on total selenium levels in prostatic tissue of men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  A M Algotar; M S Stratton; M J Xu; B L Dalkin; R B Nagle; C H Hsu; F R Ahmann; L C Clark; S P Stratton
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.900

8.  Differential effects of nanoselenium doping on healthy and cancerous osteoblasts in coculture on titanium.

Authors:  Phong A Tran; Love Sarin; Robert H Hurt; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2010-05-13

9.  Porcine serum can be biofortified with selenium to inhibit proliferation of three types of human cancer cells.

Authors:  Lv-Hui Sun; Jun-Gang Li; Hua Zhao; Jing Shi; Jia-Qiang Huang; Kang-Ning Wang; Xin-Jie Xia; Li Li; Xin Gen Lei
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Rosiglitazone prevents the progression of preinvasive lung cancer in a murine model.

Authors:  Christopher M Lyon; Donna M Klinge; Kieu C Do; Marcie J Grimes; Cindy L Thomas; Leah A Damiani; Thomas H March; Christine A Stidley; Steven A Belinsky
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.944

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.