Literature DB >> 9564151

[Epidemiology of osteoporosis].

C Scheidt-Nave1, R Ziegler, H Raspe.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have identified osteoporosis as a disease of significant public health impact and have delineated numerous potential risk factors. Nevertheless, it has proven difficult to establish preventive strategies for several reasons. First, there has been no final agreement on the definition of osteoporosis, which has hampered efforts to characterize the magnitude of the problem as a whole. Secondly, as osteoporosis is a multifactorial chronic disorder, effective programs for risk assessment and intervention depend on the development of complex disease models. In summarizing the contributions of epidemiological studies to the current understanding of osteoporosis this review intends to outline the scientific background for the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS) and its successors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9564151     DOI: 10.1007/BF03041992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)        ISSN: 0723-5003


  34 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for osteoporosis.

Authors:  J E Compston
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.478

2.  Clinical grading of spinal osteoporosis: quality of life components and spinal deformity in women with chronic low back pain and women with vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  G Leidig-Bruckner; H W Minne; C Schlaich; G Wagner; C Scheidt-Nave; T Bruckner; H J Gebest; R Ziegler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures.

Authors:  P Kannus; J Parkkari; S Niemi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  How many women have osteoporosis now?

Authors:  L J Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Hip and calcaneal bone loss increase with advancing age: longitudinal results from the study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; L Palermo; D M Black; J Cauley; M Jergas; E S Orwoll; M C Nevitt; K M Fox; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study.

Authors:  D Hans; P Dargent-Molina; A M Schott; J L Sebert; C Cormier; P O Kotzki; P D Delmas; J M Pouilles; G Breart; P J Meunier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur.

Authors:  M A Schürch; R Rizzoli; B Mermillod; H Vasey; J P Michel; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  The dilemma of osteoporosis in men.

Authors:  E Seeman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Biochemical bone resorption markers during the healing of osteoporotic fractures].

Authors:  C Heiss; L M Hoesel; M Pausch; S A Meissner; U Horas; O Kilian; U Wehr; W A Rambeck; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.