Literature DB >> 9563661

Acoustic rhinometry: an explanation of some common artefacts associated with nasal decongestion.

A Tomkinson1, R Eccles.   

Abstract

The nasal cavities of 51 healthy volunteers were examined using acoustic rhinometry before and after nasal decongestant. Several specific dimensions were studied, which included the minimum cross-sectional area, and three volumes corresponding to the anterior, middle and posterior regions of the nasal airway. An average acoustic rhinometry trace was constructed for the whole group of subjects, before and after decongestion, from data extracted from the raw data files written to the computer hard disk for each subject. A 27.5% (P < 0.0001) increase in the minimum cross-sectional area was observed, with no shift in its position. The greatest increase in nasal dimensions was seen in the anterior and middle parts of the nose, however, significant changes were also seen in the posterior nasal cavity and post nasal space. There are a number of possible sources of artefact. First, confusion of the first and second minima may produce apparent movement of the minimum cross-sectional area following nasal decongestion. Second, a postulated change in the acoustic path length may lead to apparent changes in volume in certain regions of the nose. Third, a variable and uncontrollable degree of sound energy loss will occur into the opposite nasal cavity beyond the posterior border of the septum. An apparent increase in the dimensions of this region will be seen as the opposite cavity decongests. We feel that all users of the acoustic rhinometer need to be aware of these potential sources of artefact, and attention needs to be focused on an agreed definition of the components of the acoustic rhinometry trace.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9563661     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.00066.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci        ISSN: 0307-7772


  6 in total

1.  [Optical Rhinometry. Continuous, direct measurement of swelling of the nasal mucosa with allergen provocation. Real-time monitoring of the nasal provocation test using optical rhinometry].

Authors:  E G Wüstenberg; K-B Hüttenbrink; B Hauswald; U Hampel; E Schleicher
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Critical evaluation of different objective techniques of nasal airway assessment: a clinical review.

Authors:  P A R Clement; S Halewyck; F Gordts; O Michel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Adult nasal volumes assessed by acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Adriana de Oliveira Camargo Gomes; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio-Teixeira; Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

4.  Nasal cavity geometry of healthy adults assessed using acoustic rhinometry.

Authors:  Adriana de Oliveira Camargo Gomes; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio-Teixeira; Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade; Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

5.  Acoustic rhinometry: anatomic correlation of the first two notches found in the nasal echogram.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Nazareth Nigro; Josiane Faria de Aguiar Nigro; Richard Louis Voegels; Olavo Mion; João Ferreira Mello Junior
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2005-08-02

6.  Internal nasal dimensions of adults with nasal obstruction.

Authors:  Inge Elly Kiemle Trindade; Priscila Capelato Prado Conegliam; Sergio Henrique Kiemle Trindade; Norimar Hernandes Dias; Ana Claudia Martins Sampaio-Teixeira
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.