Literature DB >> 956356

Effect of delay on culture of urine.

R Hindman, B Tronic, R Bartlett.   

Abstract

One hundred random urine specimens which were submitted for culture were planted using a calibrated loop within 2 h of collection and 2 and 4 h later after standing at room temperature. Colonies were counted after an 18- to 24-h incubation at 37 degrees C. Fifteen of the specimens demonstrated increases in counts exceeding 1 X log10; four increased from less than 10(5)/ml to greater than 10(5)/ml (three by the 4-h culture and a fourth by the 6-h culture), supporting the concept that delays of greater than 2 h in inoculating cultures may produce results which could cause errors in diagnosis.

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 956356      PMCID: PMC274399          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.4.1.102-103.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  3 in total

1.  Effects of delayed culture on semiquantitative urinary bacteriology results.

Authors:  T L Shrestha
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Culture of the urine.

Authors:  P D HOEPRICH
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1960-12

3.  Transportation delay and the microbiological quality of clinical specimens.

Authors:  H Jefferson; H P Dalton; M R Escobar; M J Allison
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.493

  3 in total
  10 in total

1.  Microbial stabilization of antibiotic-containing urine samples by using the FLORA-STAT urine transport system.

Authors:  G L Dorn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Urine Test Strips: How reproducible are readings?

Authors:  R A Winkens; P Leffers; C P Degenaar
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  ACP Best Practice No 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  J C Graham; A Galloway
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evaluation of liquid and lyophilized preservatives for urine culture.

Authors:  M P Weinstein
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of preservative fluid for urine collected for culture.

Authors:  B A Lauer; L B Reller; S Mirrett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Urine culture transport tubes: effect of sample volume on bacterial toxicity of the preservative.

Authors:  K K Nickander; C J Shanholtzer; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of the B-D urine culture kit with a standard culture method and with the MS-2.

Authors:  W A Hubbard; P J Shalis; K D McClatchey
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the B-D urine culture kit.

Authors:  K L Guenther; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Effect of urogenital cleaning with paper soap on bacterial contamination rate while collecting midstream urine specimens.

Authors:  Rashmi Shrestha; Narayan Gyawali; Rajendra Gurung; Ritu Amatya; Shyamal Kumar Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2013-01

10.  Effectiveness of Preanalytic Practices on Contamination and Diagnostic Accuracy of Urine Cultures: a Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark T LaRocco; Jacob Franek; Elizabeth K Leibach; Alice S Weissfeld; Colleen S Kraft; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Debra Rodahl; Edward J Peterson; Nancy E Cornish
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 26.132

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.