Literature DB >> 11729209

ACP Best Practice No 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

J C Graham1, A Galloway.   

Abstract

Urinary tract infection is common, and it is not surprising that urine specimens make up a large proportion of those samples submitted to the routine diagnostic laboratory. Many of these specimens will show no evidence of infection and several methods can be used to screen out negative samples. Those that grow bacteria need to be carefully assessed to quantify the degree of bacteriuria and hence clinical relevance. To influence treatment, a final report should be produced within 24 hours of specimen receipt, with turnaround times continuously monitored. Much work needs to be done to determine the cost effectiveness involved in processing urine specimens and the evidence base for the final report provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11729209      PMCID: PMC1731340          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.12.911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  34 in total

1.  Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  Trans Assoc Am Physicians       Date:  1956

2.  The Second National Prevalence Survey of infection in hospitals--overview of the results.

Authors:  A M Emmerson; J E Enstone; M Griffin; M C Kelsey; E T Smyth
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  False positive results for leucocytes in urine dipstick test with common antibiotics.

Authors:  J H Beer; A Vogt; K Neftel; P Cottagnoud
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

4.  Electrochemical method for the early detection of urinary-tract infections.

Authors:  V A Lamb; H P Dalton; J R Wilkins
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Evaluation of Malthus 128H microbiological growth analyser for detecting significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  T K Smith; R Eggington; A A Pease; D M Harris; R C Spencer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Screening of urine cultures by three automated systems.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; G L Tan; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Urine culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of contaminated urine cultures in 906 institutions.

Authors:  P Valenstein; F Meier
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Heterogeneity within apparently pure cultures of Escherichia coli freshly isolated from significant bacteriuria.

Authors:  R Freeman; P R Sisson; D Burdess
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.472

9.  A reassessment of the importance of "low-count" bacteriuria in young women with acute urinary symptoms.

Authors:  C M Kunin; L V White; T H Hua
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF SIGNIFICANT BACTERIURIA IN LARGE GROUPS OF PATIENTS.

Authors:  D A LEIGH; J D WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1964-09       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  22 in total

1.  Electronic publishing and internet learning.

Authors:  P J van Diest; H Holzel; M Reid; M Crook; G Spickett
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Practical bench comparison of BBL CHROMagar Orientation and standard two-plate media for urine cultures.

Authors:  Holly A D'Souza; Mary Campbell; Ellen Jo Baron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A comparison of the performance of commercially available chromogenic agars for the isolation and presumptive identification of organisms from urine.

Authors:  D Fallon; G Ackland; N Andrews; D Frodsham; S Howe; K Howells; K J Nye; R E Warren
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2.

Authors:  W S Smellie; J O Forth; C A M McNulty; L Hirschowitz; D Lilic; R Gosling; D Bareford; E Logan; K G Kerr; G P Spickett; J Hoffman; A Galloway; C A Bloxham
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Testing by Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and with bacterial culture in a diagnostic laboratory: a comparison.

Authors:  R Evans; M M Davidson; L R W Sim; A J Hay
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Comparative evaluation of Vitek 2 identification and susceptibility testing of urinary tract pathogens directly and isolated from chromogenic media.

Authors:  M J Munoz-Dávila; M Roig; G Yagüe; A Blázquez; C Salvador; M Segovia
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  [Urinary tract infections : What has been confirmed in therapy?]

Authors:  J Marcon; C G Stief; G Magistro
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Risk prediction with procalcitonin and clinical rules in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  David T Huang; Lisa A Weissfeld; John A Kellum; Donald M Yealy; Lan Kong; Michael Martino; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  Midregional proadrenomedullin as a prognostic tool in community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  David T Huang; Derek C Angus; John A Kellum; Nathan A Pugh; Lisa A Weissfeld; Joachim Struck; Russell L Delude; Matthew R Rosengart; Donald M Yealy
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Antimicrobial management and appropriateness of treatment of urinary tract infection in general practice in Ireland.

Authors:  Akke Vellinga; Martin Cormican; Belinda Hanahoe; Kathleen Bennett; Andrew W Murphy
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.