Literature DB >> 9561341

The classification of calcium antagonists and their selection in the treatment of hypertension. A reappraisal.

T F Lüscher1, F Cosentino.   

Abstract

Calcium antagonists have become one of the most important advances in the treatment of hypertension since their introduction over 20 years ago. The increase in the number of available calcium antagonists (as new formulations of pre-existing drugs or new chemical entities) over recent years has contributed to an ever-changing scenario regarding their appropriate use compared with other antihypertensive agents. As a consequence of this evolving situation, several authors have proposed a 3-generation classification of calcium antagonists currently, or soon to be, marketed in several counties. The classification system is based among other variables, on chemical structure, tissue selectivity, administration frequency and duration of action. In this article, this classification is reviewed and updated on the basis of new information that is available. In addition, factors which influence the selection of calcium antagonists in the treatment of hypertension in specific patient populations are discussed. As well as pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations, these factors also include previous experience with particular drugs in specific patient populations, cost of treatment and drug interactions. Among the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, the first generation compounds have been clearly superseded and are not recommended for use in hypertensive patients. Whilst the second generation agents represent an adequate treatment, third generation calcium antagonists possess distinct advantages. Definitive confirmation of the role of calcium antagonists in hypertension lies in several ongoing large multicentre trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9561341     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199855040-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  45 in total

Review 1.  "Cardioprotection"--not all calcium antagonists are created equal: second round.

Authors:  F H Messerli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Differential activation of cardiac and peripheral sympathetic nervous system by nifedipine: role of pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  R R Wenzel; G Allegranza; C Binggeli; S Shaw; P Weidmann; T F Lüscher; G Noll
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators.

Authors:  J A Staessen; R Fagard; L Thijs; H Celis; G G Arabidze; W H Birkenhäger; C J Bulpitt; P W de Leeuw; C T Dollery; A E Fletcher; F Forette; G Leonetti; C Nachev; E T O'Brien; J Rosenfeld; J L Rodicio; J Tuomilehto; A Zanchetti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Effect of verapamil on mortality and major events after acute myocardial infarction (the Danish Verapamil Infarction Trial II--DAVIT II)

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-10-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Effect of the calcium antagonist felodipine as supplementary vasodilator therapy in patients with chronic heart failure treated with enalapril: V-HeFT III. Vasodilator-Heart Failure Trial (V-HeFT) Study Group.

Authors:  J N Cohn; S Ziesche; R Smith; I Anand; W B Dunkman; H Loeb; G Cintron; W Boden; L Baruch; P Rochin; L Loss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation Study Group.

Authors:  M Packer; C M O'Connor; J K Ghali; M L Pressler; P E Carson; R N Belkin; A B Miller; G W Neuberg; D Frid; J H Wertheimer; A B Cropp; D L DeMets
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Pharmacology of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists: relationship between lipophilicity and pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  P A van Zwieten; M Pfaffendorf
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1993-12

Review 8.  Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M Haria; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Structure and function of the rat basilar artery during chronic nitric oxide synthase inhibition.

Authors:  P Moreau; H Takase; C F Küng; M M van Rooijen; T Schaffner; T F Lüscher
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  The endothelium in hypertension: bystander, target or mediator?

Authors:  T F Lüscher
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1994-12
View more
  12 in total

1.  Smooth blood pressure control obtained with extended-release felodipine in elderly patients with hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Roberto Antonicelli; Stefano Omboni; Di Ciò Giovanni; Roberto Ansuini; Alfredo Mori; Rosaria Gesuita; Gianfranco Parati; Enrico Paciaroni
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  Manidipine: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  S M Cheer; K McClellan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension.

Authors:  Shobha Sahney
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 4.  Fixed-dose combinations as initial therapy for hypertension: a review of approved agents and a guide to patient selection.

Authors:  Bernard Waeber; François Feihl; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Drug treatment of stable angina pectoris in the elderly: defining the place of calcium channel antagonists.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Roger J C Hall
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Development and evaluation of buccoadhesive controlled release tablets of lercanidipine.

Authors:  Shrikant Charde; Madri Mudgal; Lajwinder Kumar; Ranendra Saha
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  New Generation Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertensive Treatment.

Authors:  Yuri Ozawa; Koichi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Kobori
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rev       Date:  2006-05-01

Review 8.  Lercanidipine: a review of its use in hypertension.

Authors:  K J McClellan; B Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.431

Review 9.  A clinical perspective on mucoadhesive buccal drug delivery systems.

Authors:  Ritu M Gilhotra; Mohd Ikram; Sunny Srivastava; Neeraj Gilhotra
Journal:  J Biomed Res       Date:  2013-06-06

Review 10.  Amlodipine and valsartan as components of a rational and effective fixed-dose combination.

Authors:  Bernard Waeber; Luis M Ruilope
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.